Mission to Probe the Universe's Darkest Secrets

  • Thread starter Thread starter skydivephil
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probe
AI Thread Summary
The mission aims to provide significant insights into the accelerated expansion of the universe, potentially confirming the Lambda-CDM model of cosmology with an 80%-90% likelihood. It is expected to yield extensive data on galaxies, enhancing our understanding of their formation and behavior. The mission will focus on measuring the equation of state parameter, w, with the possibility of detecting deviations from the standard value of -1, which would indicate new physics. Additionally, it may constrain the first time derivative of w, offering deeper insights into dark energy dynamics. Overall, the Euclid mission is poised to deliver crucial advancements in cosmological research.
Space news on Phys.org
skydivephil said:
http://phys.org/news/2012-06-mission-go-ahead-probe-universe-darkest.html

So what reasonable expectation can we have from this mission?
We should be able to have far, far better constraints on the nature of the accelerated expansion. This kind of satellite can really do a great job at nailing that down. The website there mentions dark matter, but that's basically a solved problem, at least in terms of its effects on cosmology.

I'd say that there's about an 80%-90% chance that Euclid will confirm the Lambda-CDM model of cosmology yet again. So a fairly small chance that it will detect something fundamentally new about the nature of the accelerated expansion. It will, however, bring in a treasure trove of information for people interested in studying galaxies, as it will be observing very large numbers of galaxies in the process of doing its mission to measure the accelerated expansion.
 
Are we talking about trying to measure w to a higher level of accuracy? If so the only revolutionary discovery will be if we got a non -1 answer right?
 
skydivephil said:
Are we talking about trying to measure w to a higher level of accuracy? If so the only revolutionary discovery will be if we got a non -1 answer right?
Well, there are other ways to parameterize dark energy, but yes, this is essentially correct.
 
skydivephil said:
Are we talking about trying to measure w to a higher level of accuracy? If so the only revolutionary discovery will be if we got a non -1 answer right?

I think they should also be able to measure/constrain the first time derivative of w as well?
 
nicksauce said:
I think they should also be able to measure/constrain the first time derivative of w as well?
Well, what's usually done now is to take w_0 (the value of w today) and w_a (the derivative of w with respect to the scale factor a). But there are other possibilities as well. Either way, Euclid should offer some pretty tremendous constraints on dark energy compared to current constraints, no matter what sort of parameters you use.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top