MIT graduates cannot power a light bulb with a battery

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers around the misconception that MIT graduates cannot light a bulb with a battery. Participants debate the validity of the question posed, with some asserting that a circuit can be completed using one wire, while others highlight the importance of battery voltage in lighting a bulb. Key points include the distinction between AC and DC bulbs, the role of preconceived notions in education, and the societal tendency to criticize rather than educate. The conversation also references educational figures like Dr. Paul Sadler from Harvard, emphasizing the need to address misconceptions in science education.

PREREQUISITES
  • Basic understanding of electrical circuits and components
  • Knowledge of AC vs. DC current and their applications
  • Familiarity with the principles of voltage and resistance
  • Awareness of educational psychology and misconceptions in learning
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the differences between AC and DC electrical systems
  • Explore the concept of voltage and its impact on circuit functionality
  • Study educational psychology to understand how misconceptions affect learning
  • Investigate the role of critical thinking in science education
USEFUL FOR

Educators, electrical engineering students, psychology professionals, and anyone interested in improving science communication and education methodologies.

Zero-shift
Messages
8
Reaction score
0


Now, to be honest, I can comfortably light it with TWO piece of wires and not ONE.
So , was it a trick question?

Technically, those are havard grads.

Please weigh in.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
What's the point of this?
 
Zero-shift said:
Now, to be honest, I can comfortably light it with TWO piece of wires and not ONE.
you saw at 2:00 a kid do it with one wire... so nyaahhhh .
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: phinds
Zero-shift said:
I can comfortably light it with TWO piece of wires and not ONE
Yes. But we can connect one terminal of the bulb directly to one terminal of the battery like a guy did at 1:58...
Edit:Oh.. Jim already said that while I was typing.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Anthony Volkman and Joppy
Zero-shift said:
So , was it a trick question?
Maybe.. The question was "Do you think you can light a bulb using a battery and a wire?". Even if I could complete the circuit with just one wire (like a guy did at 1:58), I can't be sure if the bulb will light up. If the battery voltage is not sufficient, it won't light up even though the circuit is complete.
 
Kind of reminds me of all those videos where people circulate petitions to ban "dihydrogen monoxide", citing things like it's the main component in acid rain, found in heavy industrial solvents, removed from tumors of cancer patients, can cause severe burns in its gaseous state etc. and everyone rushes to sign up for it.

cnh1995 said:
Maybe.. The question was "Do you think you can light a bulb using a battery and a wire?". Even if I could complete the circuit with just one wire (like a guy did at 1:58), I can't be sure if the bulb will light up. If the battery voltage is not sufficient, it won't light up even though the circuit is complete.

If it's just a basic incandescent filament it will light up; it just might be extremely dull (assuming that there's at least some voltage across the battery terminals)

OmCheeto said:
I can do it with no wires.

Honestly that was the exact same thing I was thinking of watching the video!
 
Without knowing for sure the majors of the students, it is tough to know if this is a big deal or not...though I did watch long enough for an ME to say she couldn't do it...and weep a little.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: cnh1995 and billy_joule
it's a psychology demonstration not a science one
kids expect honesty
hand them a 120 volt bulb and a 1.5 volt battery
and they assume it's an honest question, "Can you complete a circuit" ... or "Can this this battery possibly light that bulb"

Take a look at the comments on the youtube site.
It's kinda sad because the responses to the video show a baser side of human behavior, to build one's self up by tearing down others
youtube.com/watch?v=aIhk9eKOLzQ&feature=youtu.be
one commenter observed the bulbs had Edison bases so presumably are 120 volt lamps and can't be lit with a 1.5 volt battery
Most of the rest were derogatory toward the grads many gleefully so.
(...I wonder of the kid at 1:58 pulled that flashlight bulb out of his 'typical engineer's cluttered pocket ' ? ...)

"The real "haves" are they who can acquire freedom, self-confidence, and even riches without depriving others of them. They acquire all of these by developing and applying their potentialities.
On the other hand, the real "have nots" are they who cannot have aught except by depriving others of it. They can feel free only by diminishing the freedom of others, self-confident by spreading fear and dependence among others, and rich by making others poor." eric hoffer

...

Sadler teaches educators-to-be
http://scholar.harvard.edu/psadler/home
Dr. Sadler has taught Harvard’s courses for students preparing to be science teachers and for the next generation of science professors. As F.W. Wright Senior Lecturer in Astronomy, he carries on Harvard’s oldest undergraduate course in science, Celestial Navigation. He directs the CfA’s Science Education Department,...
he's made other videos demonstrating failures of educators


and he has a point , you need to discover and uproot students' preconceived notions.
As evidenced by another comment to first video 'Those were AC bulbs that can't be lit by a DC .'
he got an award for researching that
https://www.cfa.harvard.edu/sed/staff/Sadler/articles/Psych%20Models.pdf
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mheslep and OmCheeto
  • #10
jim hardy said:
Take a look at the comments on the youtube site.
It's kinda sad because the responses to the video show a baser side of human behavior, to build one's self up by tearing down others
This has become the norm on the internet in general. Youtube can promise results when looking for this type of behavior. Sad. I can't decide if it is since a lot of people like to see themselves have some input or if they are just jerks. As usual, the biggest mouths have the least to say in terms of substance.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: OmCheeto
  • #11
Averagesupernova said:
...
As usual, the biggest mouths have the least to say in terms of substance.

That's been my experience with people, both on and off of the internet. My theory is; "Bad potty training".

The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wise people so full of doubts.
--- Bertrand Russell​

ps. I read the entire wiki entry on "Eric Hoffer", which is why I eventually pushed the "like" button on Jim's post, as most everything else just depressed the hell out of me.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: CalcNerd, Fervent Freyja and jim hardy
  • #12
Yes cheeto, large mouths with little to contribute definitely goes beyond the internet and into regular life. I wonder if they get worse on the net though since they feel anonymous. That Bertrand Russell quote is very true. I always wonder if I am doing something and I have no doubts that I MUST be missing something. It is a good thing to question your moves in life. Good and new things often come from questioning the status quo.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mheslep, analogdesign, cnh1995 and 1 other person
  • #13
Averagesupernova said:
...
Good and new things often come from questioning the status quo.

Especially internal status quo.
I remember when somewhere in the latest "Ceres" thread, I discovered that pe did ≠ mgh.

It reminded me of that moment in "The Matrix", when Oracle said to Neo; "Ohh, what's really going to bake your noodle later on is, would you still have broken it if I hadn't said anything?"

hmmm...
Perhaps this thread should be moved to the "Biology and Medical" forum.
 
  • #14
OmCheeto said:
ps. I read the entire wiki entry on "Eric Hoffer", which is why I eventually pushed the "like" button on Jim's post, as most everything else just depressed the hell out of me.
You would i think like his writing

i started with "The Passionate State of Mind" a collection of aphorisms. Some are immediately funny , some take weeks to figure out.
see also


old jim
 
Last edited:
  • #15
jim hardy said:
You would i think like his writing

i started with "The Passionate State of Mind" a collection of aphorisms. Some are immediately funny , some take weeks to figure out.

old jim
Ha!
I also checked out his quotes.
Some immediately struck me as profound, while others, well, as you say, would take me weeks to figure out.

As with all people who live in different times, places, and/or circumstances, their perspectives are always a bit skewed.
And hence, fun to figure out.

ps. I've never been a political historian, so I never knew much about Karl Marx, but when I saw what Hoffer said about him, I almost died laughing. Especially when I found out it was true.
 
  • #16
I vaguely remember a TV interview with Eric Sevareid
and thinking at the time "what a smart and entertaining man !"

i think I've found it on youtube , added it to my prior post
havent watched it yet myself but look forward to seeing it from perspective of an old guy now instead of a young one
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: OmCheeto
  • #17
  • Q: How many engineering students does it take to change a lightbulb?
A: One, but the rest of the class copies the report.

  • Q: How many first year civil engineering students does it take to change a lightbulb ?
A: None. That's a second year subject.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K