MIT vs Princeton vs Wisconsin vs UCLA for plasma phys.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the leading programs in plasma physics, with Wisconsin, MIT, and Princeton frequently mentioned as top contenders. Wisconsin is noted for its strong reputation, while MIT's Alcator CMOD has recently regained funding, although its long-term future remains uncertain. Princeton is highlighted for its appeal, particularly among prospective graduate students. UCLA is also recognized, though it is said to focus more on basic plasma physics rather than magnetic fusion. Participants express a preference for theory and computation, while remaining open to experimental opportunities. Overall, the consensus is that Wisconsin, MIT, and Princeton offer excellent programs in plasma physics.
Hercuflea
Messages
593
Reaction score
49
Which has the best program/research in plasma physics? I would have said Wisconsin but Alcator CMOD got its funding back this year so maybe MIT?

I am talking about either the engineering or physics departments, doesn't matter.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not really into plasma, but one of my friends who wants to do plasma has raved about Princeton's program and is desperate to get in there for graduate school. Hopefully someone who's more qualified can help!
 
Are you a senior? Are you interested in Theory, Computation, or Experiment? Are their particular people that you're interested in working with, or experiments that you want to work on?

I always say Wisconsin, but I'm biased!

Truthfully Wisconsin, MIT, and Princeton are all good. You can't go wrong with either.
UCLA is a good school too. I think they focus more on basic plasma physics and less on magnetic fusion.

CMODs is only funded for this year. Its future is still unclear, and there is no guarantee that it will be funded in the future.
 
I'm leaning more towards theory and computation but I'd be open to experimental work too.
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Hello, I’m an undergraduate student pursuing degrees in both computer science and physics. I was wondering if anyone here has graduated with these degrees and applied to a physics graduate program. I’m curious about how graduate programs evaluated your applications. In addition, if I’m interested in doing research in quantum fields related to materials or computational physics, what kinds of undergraduate research experiences would be most valuable?

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
4K
Back
Top