MLE for Uniform(-A,A) - exam today

  • Thread starter Thread starter nolita_day
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exam Mle
nolita_day
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
So my prof. has not replied to my e-mail, so I was wondering if someone here can help me understand why the MLE for a random variable X~Unif(-θ,θ) is max|Xi|. Attached is the problem as well as my attempt for the solution.

Here is my thought process:

Upon sketching the graph, I thought the answer would be min( |min(Xi)|, |max(Xi)| ) because there are two different tails and the one closer to zero should have the highest value for L(θ). So if |min(Xi)| < |max(Xi)|, then L(θ = min(Xi)) > L(θ = max(Xi)), which would make min(Xi) the MLE for θ.

Whether or not this gets answered in time before my exam, I'd still be curious to know the reasoning for the correct answer :)

Thanks a bunch!
 

Attachments

  • 9.png
    9.png
    27.6 KB · Views: 637
Physics news on Phys.org
In my opinion, your last graph is slightly confused. You are attempting to show the interval [-\theta, \theta] on the graph. You should only show L as a function of \theta.

For L to be greater than 0, the conditions on \theta are:
\theta \gt 0 (or else the interval [-\theta,\theta] would have zero length)
max(X_1,X_2,...X_n) \le \theta
-\theta \le min(X_1,X_2,...X_n)

The last condition is equivalent to \theta \ge - min(X_1,X_2,...X_n)

So the graph should show L > 0 when \theta is larger than the largest of the two values -min(X_1,X_2,...X_n) and max(X_1,X_2,...X_n).

It doesn't look pretty, but you can denote that condition by
\theta \ge max( -min(X_1,X_2,...X_n), max(X_1,X_2,...X_n) )
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top