Mobility of holes and electrons

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concepts of holes and electrons in solid-state physics, specifically addressing the charge of holes, their mobility compared to electrons, and the effective mass of holes. The scope includes theoretical explanations and conceptual clarifications related to charge carriers in semiconductor physics.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how holes, defined as the absence of electrons, can possess a positive charge, suggesting that their charge should be zero.
  • Another participant explains that the absence of an electron in a filled valence band can be treated as a positive charge, leading to the concept of holes carrying a positive charge.
  • There is speculation regarding the effective mass of holes and its relation to their mobility compared to electrons, with one participant suggesting that the difference in mobility may be linked to the effective masses of the charge carriers.
  • A participant inquires about the typical locations of holes and electrons within the energy bands of a material.
  • Discussion includes the notion that effective mass is a theoretical construct used to simplify the behavior of charge carriers in a crystal lattice.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of holes and their charge, with some agreeing on the conceptual framework while others raise questions. The discussion on effective mass and mobility remains exploratory without a consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference the Drude model and the concept of effective mass, but the discussion does not resolve the implications of these concepts or their mathematical underpinnings.

jablonsky27
Messages
74
Reaction score
0
hi,
holes are the absence of electrons in the lattice, right? then how come we say holes have a +ve charge? shouldn't it be zero?
also, why is the mobility of electrons more than holes?
thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
This is what I wrote for another thread:

Defennder said:
Consider this in 1D:

We all know that J=nev where n is the concentration of electrons, v is the drift velocity.

Suppose the valence band is completely full of N electrons, then it goes without saying there can be no current flow:


[tex]J_{x} = \sum_i^N -ev_{i} = 0[/tex]

But on the other hand suppose there is one missing electron, one vacancy in the valence band where an electron should be:

[tex]J_{x}=\sum_i^{N-1}-ev_{i} = \sum_i^N -ev_{i} -(-ev_{j}) = ev_{j}[/tex]

Notice that the final expression on the right can be thought of as current due to the drift of a single positive charge, since there is no minus sign. That is why we are justified in thinking that we can treat absence of negative charges as positively charged holes.

As for the other question, I'm guessing it's something to do with the magnitude of their effective masses.
 
i should ve searched for that before posting a new thread. it makes sense, yes..

what would the effective mass of a hole be??
 
Where would you usually find a hole? And where would you usually find an electron?

Where == which band?

Yes, the effective masses of holes and electrons are different. The mobility is a function of the effective mass, which is a theoretical tool brought into simplify the description of a charged particle in a crystal. Classically, the concept of an effective mass is analogous to that of a 'psuedo force' in Newtonian mechanics.

In the simplified, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drude_model" , for a fixed mean free time.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
722
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K