Model Solenoid: Best Method & Troubleshooting

  • Thread starter Thread starter eigenstaytes
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Modeling Solenoid
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the best methods for modeling a solenoid, particularly the calculation of off-axis elements. One participant attempted to calculate these elements but encountered inaccuracies, prompting questions about the definition and calculation methods for off-axis components. Suggestions include using Ampere's law for on-axis calculations and the Biot-Savart law for off-axis elements. An empirical approach involving a metal slinky, a current source, and a flux meter is also proposed for practical experimentation. The conversation emphasizes the need for precise methodologies in solenoid modeling.
eigenstaytes
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
What would be the best method to model a solenoid? I tried writing a program that calculated the off axis elements of the solenoid but the value came out wrong. Any idea?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
What do you mean by "off axis elements"?
 
I drew up a quick diagram to show what I mean.

7WEA4Ek.jpg

The on-axis elements (along the Z-axis which is located along the center of the solenoid) can be calculated via some method. Ampere's law possibly? However, what would I have to do to calculate the values which are not along the Z-axis?
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top