Modeling Converging Spherical Waves in Optics

AI Thread Summary
A spherical wave diverging from a point can be approximated as a parabolic wave in the paraxial case, particularly around the z-axis. When a lens is aligned with the optical axis, the outgoing parabolic wave from one focus will converge at the other focus. The mathematical modeling of this converging wave involves changing the sign of the wavevector k, rather than the sign of ωt, to reflect the time reversal concept. Participants in the discussion clarify the relationship between diverging and converging waves, emphasizing the importance of accurate mathematical representation. Understanding these principles is crucial for effectively modeling wave behavior in optics.
Wminus
Messages
173
Reaction score
29
Hi. A spherical wave ##e^{i(kr-\omega t)}## diverging from a single point ##(x=0,y=0,z=-z_0)## can be approximated as a parabolic wave in the paraxial case around the z-axis. I.e., ##k r = k \sqrt{x^2+y^2+z^2} \simeq k (z +\frac{x^2+y^2}{2z})##.

OK, then let's say a lens is placed such that its optical axis coincides with the ##z## axis and its focus points are at ##-z_0## and ##z_0##. In this case, the outgoing parabolic wave from ##-z_0## will be focused into the point ##z_0##. My question is, how is this to be modeled mathematically? Intuitively I would guess that ##k r \simeq k ( z - \frac{x^2+y^2}{2z})##, but what is ##kr## equal to in the accompanying case of a converging spherical wave? Something ala ##e^{i(kr + \omega t)} e^{i \phi}##, where ##\phi## is some phase factor?

I would appreciate it if you guys could help me in clearing this stuff up :)

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Science news on Phys.org
Wminus said:
In this case, the outgoing parabolic wave from −z0-z_0 will be focused into the point z0
If this is converging lens, then the rays will be focused at infinity, that is the outgoing rays are collimated.
 
blue_leaf77 said:
If this is converging lens, then the rays will be focused at infinity, that is the outgoing rays are collimated.
crap, yeah you're right. I was thinking in terms of rays from the object plane being focused into the image plane, but I mixed it up. sorry.

But anyway, do you know the mathematical form of waves converging to a single point?
 
converging spherical wave must be the inverse of the diverging one, the sign of the wavevector k must change (better change the sign of k rather than the sign of ##\omega t## as you did above, this will mean time reversal).
 
  • Like
Likes Wminus
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top