Modeling the Course of a Viral Illness

  • Thread starter Thread starter jgens
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Course Modeling
jgens
Gold Member
Messages
1,575
Reaction score
50

Homework Statement



When certain viral particles enter the body, they replicate to 160% every four hours and the immune system eliminates these particular viral particles at the rate of 50000 viral particles per hour. Find an equation modeling this viral growth.

Homework Equations



N/A

The Attempt at a Solution



Let n be the function modeling this viral growth, then clearly

n_0(1.6^{t/4}) - 50000t \geq n(t) \geq (n_0 - 50000t)(1.6^{t/4})

since the first expression assumes that every particle replicates first and then 50000t particles are eliminated and the last expression assumes that all 50000t particles are eliminated and then they replicate. In reality, the particles are always replicating and being eliminated simultaneously, so n(t) must be between these two extremes. Using this same train of thought, we know that . . .

(n_0 - 50000t)(1.6^{t/4}) \leq n(t)

[(n_0 - 50000t/2)(1.6^{t/8}) - 50000t/2](1.6^{t/8}) \leq n(t)

\vdots​

n_0(1.6^{t/4}) - 50000t \sum_{i=0}^{n-1} \frac{1.6^{\frac{(n-i)x}{n}}}{n} \leq n(t)

and

n_0(1.6^{t/4}) - 50000t \geq n(t)

(n_0(1.6^{t/8}) - 50000t/2)(1.6^{t/8}) - 50000t/2 \geq n(t)

\vdots​

n_0(1.6^{t/4}) - 50000t \sum_{i=1}^{n} \frac{1.6^{\frac{(n-i)x}{n}}}{n} \geq n(t)

Since 1.6^{t/4} is an integrable function and because the two sums above represent the upper and lower Darboux sums for 1.6^{t/4}, it follows that

n(t) = n_0(1.6^{t/4}) - 50000t \int_0^t 1.6^{x/4} dx

I'm sorry that my work isn't perfectly clear at the moment, but seeing as I'm fairly certain that it's wrong, I'm not sure that it matters much. I would appreciate help actually starting this problem correctly (which I'm fairly certain that I haven't done). Any help is appreciated. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If anyone needs me to clarify anything, please let me know and I'll get to work on it.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top