Modern Algebra unified subgroup question

  • Thread starter Thread starter PsychonautQQ
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algebra Subgroup
PsychonautQQ
Messages
781
Reaction score
10

Homework Statement


If H and K are subgroups of G, show HUK is a subgroup of G if and only if H < K or K < H ( the < meaning that all the elements of H are in K or all the elements of K are in H).

Homework Equations


None

The Attempt at a Solution


I believe the problem here is HUK might not be a closed group. Certainly all the elements of HUK are also in G.

If all the elements of H are in K, then hk is an element of HUK for all h,k.

If the intersection of H and K does not equal H or K, that means that hk may not be in HUK as it is not closed.

These are my thoughts so far. Am I on the right track here? How do I start turning this into a proof?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, you are on the right track. Suppose h is not an element of K and k is not an element of H. Can you show hk is not an element of H or K? Use proof by contradiction.
 
  • Like
Likes PsychonautQQ
There is a nice, helpful result that a subset H of a group G is a subgroup of G if for any a,b in H, ## ab^{-1}## is in H.
Now if a,b are either both in A or both in B, no problem, but consider what happens when a is in H and b is in K-H ( of course then we show we must have H subset K ).
 
  • Like
Likes PsychonautQQ
h is not an element of K and k is not an element of H. Then hk being an element of HUK is a contradiction because.. I'm lost >.<
 
PsychonautQQ said:
h is not an element of K and k is not an element of H. Then hk being an element of HUK is a contradiction because.. I'm lost >.<

Suppose hk is an element of K. Say hk=k'. Solve for h and think about it.
 
Well, notice that subgroups are closed under the group operation. Let a in H, let b be in K-H and

## ab:=c \in H ## . Then ##b= a^{-1} c ## , so that b is the product of elements of H, and the product of

elements in H must be in H.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Back
Top