Modern Physics - Invariability of Newton's 2nd Law under a GT?

PFStudent
Messages
169
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Show that the form of Newton's Second Law is invariant under:
(a). a Galilean Transformation (GT) in 1-Dimension.
(b). a Galilean Transformation (GT) in 2-Dimensions.
(c). a Galilean Transformation (GT) in 3-Dimensions.

Homework Equations


Newton's Second Law.
<br /> {{\sum_{}^{}}{\vec{F}}} = {m{\vec{a}}}{\,}{\,}{\text{[N.II.L.]}}<br />

GT for 1-D
<br /> {{x}^{\prime}} = {{x}-{vt}}<br />

<br /> {{y}^{\prime}} = {y}<br />

<br /> {{z}^{\prime}} = {z}<br />

<br /> {{t}^{\prime}} = {t}<br />

GT for 2-D
<br /> {{x}^{\prime}} = {{x}-{{v}{\left({\frac{x}{\sqrt{{x^2}+{y^2}}}}\right)}{t}}}<br />
<br /> {{y}^{\prime}} = {{y}-{{v}{\left({\frac{y}{\sqrt{{x^2}+{y^2}}}}\right)}{t}}}<br />
<br /> {{z}^{\prime}} = {z}<br />

<br /> {{t}^{\prime}} = {t}<br />

GT for 3-D
<br /> {{x}^{\prime}} = {{x}-{{v}{\left({\frac{x}{\sqrt{{x^2}+{y^2}+{z^2}}}}\right)}{t}}}<br />
<br /> {{y}^{\prime}} = {{y}-{{v}{\left({\frac{y}{\sqrt{{x^2}+{y^2}+{z^2}}}}\right)}{t}}}<br />
<br /> {{z}^{\prime}} = {{z}-{{v}{\left({\frac{z}{\sqrt{{x^2}+{y^2}+{z^2}}}}\right)}{t}}}<br />
<br /> {{t}^{\prime}} = {t}<br />

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm not sure exactly where to begin here. Particularly, how to proceed in the: 2-D and 3-D; cases since I have extra variables to deal with in those GT equations.

Thanks,

-PFStudent
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
How would you proceed in the 1-D case?
 
Hey,
Gokul43201 said:
How would you proceed in the 1-D case?
Well, in the 1-D case we are only considering motion along one axis, where {\vec{v}} is a constant, hence the following Galilean Transformation,
<br /> {{x}^{\prime}} = {{x}-{vt}}<br />

<br /> {{y}^{\prime}} = {y}<br />

<br /> {{z}^{\prime}} = {z}<br />

<br /> {{t}^{\prime}} = {t}<br />

So, my guess is that by beginning with the following,
<br /> {{x}^{\prime}} = {{x}-{vt}}<br />

I can proceed as follows,
<br /> {{x}^{\prime}} = {{x}-{vt}}<br />

<br /> {{\frac{d}{dt}}{\Bigl[{{x}^{\prime}}\Bigr]}} = {{\frac{d}{dt}}{\Bigl[{{x}-{vt}}\Bigr]}}<br />

<br /> {{\frac{d{{x}^{\prime}}}{dt}}} = {{\frac{dx}{dt}}-{v}}<br />

<br /> {{\frac{d}{dt}}{\left[{\frac{d{{x}^{\prime}}}{dt}}\right]}} = {{\frac{d}{dt}}{\left[{{\frac{dx}{dt}}-{v}}\right]}}<br />

<br /> {\frac{{{d}^{2}}{{x}^{\prime}}}{d{{t}^{2}}}} = {{\frac{{{d}^{2}}{x}}{d{{t}^{2}}}}-{0}}<br />

<br /> {\left({{a}^{\prime}}\right)} = {\left({a}\right)}<br />

<br /> {{a}^{\prime}} = {a}<br />

So, I guess by showing that,
<br /> {{a}^{\prime}} = {a}<br />
this implies that N.II.L. is invariant under a (1-D) Galilean Transformation? If so, why?

Thanks,

-PFStudent
 
Last edited:
Hey,

Any help on this, still not sure if I'm on the right path here.

Thanks,

-PFStudent
 
Hello everyone, I’m considering a point charge q that oscillates harmonically about the origin along the z-axis, e.g. $$z_{q}(t)= A\sin(wt)$$ In a strongly simplified / quasi-instantaneous approximation I ignore retardation and take the electric field at the position ##r=(x,y,z)## simply to be the “Coulomb field at the charge’s instantaneous position”: $$E(r,t)=\frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_{0}}\frac{r-r_{q}(t)}{||r-r_{q}(t)||^{3}}$$ with $$r_{q}(t)=(0,0,z_{q}(t))$$ (I’m aware this isn’t...
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
Back
Top