Modulus & Division: Last Digit of Numbers Explained

Rishav sapahi
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Isn't it amusing ?What could be the probable explanation for this?Also when operated by division operator gives the rest of the number as the quotient
(Note only when the divisor is 10)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Rishav sapahi said:
(Note only when the divisor is 10)

Are you asking why k (mod 10) is equal to the integer corresponding to the last digit in the representation of k base 10 ?
 
This allows you to do really fun calculations, actually. Quick, what are the last two digits of 7482? Well, that's just 7482 (mod 100). Since 7 and 100 are relatively prime, and since φ(100) = 40 (where φ is the Euler phi function), 740 = 1 (mod 100), and so 7482 = 72 (mod 100) = 49. So the last two digits are 49. Amaze your friends with this! ;)
 
  • Like
Likes Rishav sapahi
Stephen Tashi said:
Are you asking why k (mod 10) is equal to the integer corresponding to the last digit in the representation of k base 10 ?
Yes , for me , its very much amusing .This thing is forcing me to study number theory .
 
Last edited:
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
Back
Top