Modulus of a Sequence: How to Prove Nullness?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rohan03
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sequences
rohan03
Messages
56
Reaction score
0
I know in general how to prove if sequence is null or not . But here is my confusion
- method in the textbook I am reading - asks that to prove that any sequence is null we must show that for each ε>0, there is an integer N such that modulus of the given sequence is < ε, for all n>N

now I also understand this but my dilema is
taking modulu say for example given sequence is
{(1+(-1)^n)/(n+(-1)^n )}
taking modulus gives:
|(1+(-1)^n)/(n+(-1)^n )| is modulus 2/(n+1) ?

just not sure
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
rohan03 said:
I know in general how to prove if sequence is null or not . But here is my confusion
- method in the textbook I am reading - asks that to prove that any sequence is null we must show that for each ε>0, there is an integer N such that modulus of the given sequence is < ε, for all n>N

now I also understand this but my dilema is
taking modulu say for example given sequence is
{(1+(-1)^n)/(n+(-1)^n )}
taking modulus gives:
|(1+(-1)^n)/(n+(-1)^n )| is modulus 2/(n+1) ?

just not sure


\left|\frac{1+(-1)^n}{n+(-1)^n}\right|=\left\{\begin{array}{cc}0\,&amp;\,if\,\,n\,\,is\,\,odd\\\frac{2}{n+1}\,&amp;\,if\,\,n\,\,is\,\,even\end{array}\right. , and of course the seq. begin with n=2.

DonAntonio

Ps. Of course, the absolute value has no relevance here...did you notice this?
 
Yes the question states n=2,3... So I am correct and must ignore negative values of n
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top