What is the Molar Mass of an Enzyme with a Given Osmotic Pressure?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Benzoate
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the molar mass of an enzyme based on its osmotic pressure. A 2.02-g sample of the enzyme in a 6.00-mL solution at 298K produces an osmotic pressure of 0.123 atm. Using the formula pi = MRT, the concentration is determined to be approximately 0.00503 M, leading to a calculated molar mass of about 67,000 g/mol, which is typical for enzymes. Participants confirm that this value aligns with expected ranges for enzyme molar masses, indicating no errors in the calculation. The discussion concludes that the result is reasonable and consistent with known enzyme characteristics.
Benzoate
Messages
418
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 2.02-g sample of an enzyme is used to make a 6.00-mL solution. What is the molar mass of the enzyme if the osmotic pressure of the solution at 298K is 0.123 atm? Note that enzymes are nonelectrolytes

Homework Equations



pi=MRT , R=.0821 L*atm*K^1-*mol^1-

The Attempt at a Solution



pi=MRT => pi/RT=M=.123 atm/(298K)(.0821)=.00503 M

to find molar mass, I'd want to convert my concentration into grams/mol

.00503 M =.00503 mmol/1 mL
multiply (.00503 mmol/1mL)*(6.00 mL)= .0302 mmol => .00003016 mol enzyme

so molar mass = 2.02 g enzyme /.00003016 mol enzyme = 66976. 12732 g/mol , which is unusually enormous for a typical molar mass
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I did the problem a few times and got the same answer. Althought it does seem high so I redid it a few times and kept getting the same answer. Maybe I'm missing something.
 
The answer looks right to me.
 
Benzoate said:
...so molar mass = 2.02 g enzyme /.00003016 mol enzyme = 66976. 12732 g/mol , which is unusually enormous for a typical molar mass


I assume that your answer is approximately 67,000 g/mol? This is 67 kilodaltons (kDa) which is well within the usual range for an enzyme.
 
i get the same, and expect big fat numbers for enzymes (as chemisttree points out)

4 to 1 :)
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top