Molarity of HOAc = (1.1544 x 10^-2 mol NaOH) / (0.02132 L vinegar)

  • Thread starter Thread starter asimon2008
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Molarity
AI Thread Summary
The experiment involves titrating 22.32 mL of vinegar with 0.5172 M NaOH to determine the molarity of acetic acid (HOAc) in the vinegar. The moles of NaOH used in the titration are calculated as 1.1544 x 10^-2 mol. Since the reaction between HOAc and NaOH has a 1:1 mole ratio, the moles of acetic acid are equal to the moles of NaOH. The molarity of HOAc can be calculated using the formula Ms*Ls = Mt*Lt, where Ms is the molarity of HOAc, Ls is the volume of vinegar, Mt is the molarity of NaOH, and Lt is the volume of NaOH used. The final calculation will yield the molarity of HOAc in the vinegar sample.
asimon2008
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A student performing this experiment tirates 22.32 mL of vinegar with 0.5172 M NaOH. The initial NaOH buret reading is 1.18 mL and the final NaOH buret reading is 21.35 mL. What is the molarity of HOAc in the vinegar sample?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


(22.32) mL) (1L/1000 mL) (0.5172 mol/L)= 1.1544 x 10^-2 mol NaOH
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To calculate moles of NaOH you need volume of NaOH solution. 22.32 mL was volume of acetic acid.

--
 
(moles of sought compound) = (moles of titrant compound), if their mole ratio for the reaction is one to one;
Also, for same ratio, Ms*Ls=Mt*Lt,
where subscripts are s for sought and t for titrant.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top