Molecules were held in a state of quantum superposition

Glenn
I have read about experiments where entire atoms and even whole molecules were held in a state of quantum superposition. It wasn't until an observation was made that these molecules left their indeterminate state. If whole atoms and molecules can exist in quantum superposition, does theory prohibit even more complex structures of matter from existing in a superposition as well?

-Glenn
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


Originally posted by Glenn
I have read about experiments where entire atoms and even whole molecules were held in a state of quantum superposition. It wasn't until an observation was made that these molecules left their indeterminate state. If whole atoms and molecules can exist in quantum superposition, does theory prohibit even more complex structures of matter from existing in a superposition as well?

-Glenn

As in the other thread this is a sticky subject, but one with a much clearer answer -decoherence, which shows that statiscally why many particle systems do not exhibit quantum behaviour due to the fact that there wavefunctions collapse very quickly.
 
Yes but one must ask...What is defined as observation? is it when a random wave or electron bumps into the object in question? An experiment performed by a man I believe in India, but please forgive me if I am worng, but he found a way to test for super position by using lasers and inialation (<---sp?), its very good, and I believe you can search under Hardings paradox, or soloution to...
 


Originally posted by Glenn
I have read about experiments where entire atoms and even whole molecules were held in a state of quantum superposition. It wasn't until an observation was made that these molecules left their indeterminate state. If whole atoms and molecules can exist in quantum superposition, does theory prohibit even more complex structures of matter from existing in a superposition as well?

-Glenn
Do you have some links about this? Well, I'm very interested in this subject, because long time ago I've discussed with one physics prof. about possibility of that kind superposition, and if you\re righ, I was right :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top