Moment of inertia and force needed to tilt/change axis of rotation

AI Thread Summary
In a freely rotating body with the axis of rotation along the z-axis, applying a force perpendicular to the axis induces both a tilt and an angular velocity change. The moment of inertia tensor, represented as a 3x3 matrix, is essential for calculating the effects of torque on angular acceleration. The relationship is defined by the equation τ = I·dot(ω), where τ is torque, I is the moment of inertia tensor, and dot(ω) is angular acceleration. Applying torque not aligned with the angular velocity will result in additional components of angular velocity, rather than just tilting the axis. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for analyzing rotational motion in physics.
birulami
Messages
153
Reaction score
0
Consider a freely rotating body. Let the axis of rotation be the z-axis. For simplicity assume all the mass of the body is concentrated in the x-y-plane, i.e. the plane in which the body rotates.

I have read about the moment of inertia tensor on wikipedia, but I don't see how I would combine it with a torque to tilt the axis of rotation.

Suppose the above rotating body indeed has a solid axis, albeit of zero mass, sticking out at one end with length \gt l. At z=l we apply a force perpendicular to the axis for a distance of \Delta s in the direction of -x.

Code:
  |<- apply force 
  |
  |
=====  <- x-y plane of rotation

What will happen to the to the overall rotation.

a) Will the axis tilt only a certain amount or does the force applied induce a rotation that keeps going and combines with the previous rotation.

b) What is the formula to get the tilt angle or the angular speed? I assume it somehow combines the inertia tensor and the force F or torque l\times F?

Thanks,
Harald.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Found it myself. In general it is

\tau = I\cdot\dot{\vec{\omega}}

where \tau is the torque, the equivalent of force for linear motion, I is the moment of inertia tensor (i.e. 3x3 matrix) and \dot{\vec{\omega}} is the three-vector of angular acceleration. The rest seems to be to put in the special case values. And I reckon that applying a torque that that is not just parallel to \dot{\vec{\omega}} will result in an angular velocity component, not just in a tilt of the rotational axis.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Back
Top