Moment of inertia - disk - finding dm

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the moment of inertia for a disk, specifically how to determine the mass element dm. The user initially struggles with the expression dm = (rho)*t*dA, particularly with the t*dA component. They attempted to use t*dA = (pi)(r^2)/2 but found it ineffective. After a period of no responses, the user later confirms they resolved their confusion independently. The conversation highlights the importance of clarity in defining variables and the integration process when calculating moment of inertia.
O011235813
Messages
11
Reaction score
0



Comments
----------

hey, I am trying to figure out the moment of inertia with respect to various axis. I am, having trouble figuring out how to find out dm.
I know that dm = (rho)*t*dA, but i am having trouble figuring out the t*dA part. i tried using

t*dA = (pi)(r^2)/2
That didn't work. If some1 could help me figure this out i'd be much grateful.

Here is the picture of the disk

[URL=http://img165.imageshack.us/my.php?image=semidiskad3.png][PLAIN]http://img165.imageshack.us/img165/6294/semidiskad3.png[/URL] http://g.imageshack.us/img165/semidiskad3.png/1/ [/PLAIN]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi O011235813! :smile:
O011235813 said:
hey, I am trying to figure out the moment of inertia with respect to various axis. I am, having trouble figuring out how to find out dm.
I know that dm = (rho)*t*dA, but i am having trouble figuring out the t*dA part. i tried using

t*dA = (pi)(r^2)/2
That didn't work. If some1 could help me figure this out i'd be much grateful.

hmm … no replies in almost 24 hours …

so I'm guessing everyone's as confused as I am :confused:

dm is an element of mass, and rho is density, but what are t and dA supposed to be, what shape volume are you considering (the diagram doesn't make it clear), about which axis, and how are you trying to "slice up" this volume for integration?
 
hey,

yeah sorry for the confusing. I figured it out so I'm good now. Thanks for replying back though :D
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top