Moment of Inertia for a Thick Spherical Shell

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the moment of inertia for a hollow sphere with an outer radius R and inner radius αR. The initial integration approach involves using the density and volume elements to derive the moment of inertia formula, resulting in I = (3/5)mR^2(1 - α^5)/(1 - α^3). A challenge arises when taking the limit as α approaches 1, where the expected factor of 2/3 is questioned. The error was identified as a misinterpretation of the radius in the moment of inertia equation, which was corrected by using the appropriate distance from the axis of rotation. The final calculation confirms the correct moment of inertia for a thin spherical shell.
b100c
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A) [/B]Consider a hollow sphere of uniform density with an outer radius R and inner radius \alpha R, where 0\leq\alpha\leq1. Calculate its moment of inertia.
B) Take the limit as \lim_{\alpha\to1} to determine the moment of inertia of a thin spherical shell.

Homework Equations


Moment of Inertia: I = \int r^2 dm

The Attempt at a Solution


dm = \rho dV. Where rho is density. The volume element for a sphere is dV=r^2sin\theta d\theta d\varphi dr
So I think I would integrate over a sphere but instead from inner radius to the outer radius? I = \rho \int_{\alpha R}^{R} r^4 dr \int_{0}^{\pi} sin\theta d\theta \int_{0}^{2\pi} d\varphi
Which yields \frac{4\pi}{5} \rho (R^5 - \alpha R^5)
If \rho = \frac{m}{V} = \frac{m}{\frac{4\pi (R^3 - \alpha R^3)}{3}}
Then the equation for moment of inertia becomes
I = \frac{3}{5}mR^2 \frac{1-\alpha^5}{1-\alpha^3}

The problems is now when I take the limit as alpha approaches 1, and apply l'Hopital's rule, I get that moment of inertia is mR^2, when there should be a factor of \frac{2}{3}?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In your I calculation, the r in your relevant equation is not the distance from the origin, but the distance from the axis of rotation ...
 
  • Like
Likes b100c
Thanks BvU, that was a stupid mistake on my part. I replaced r with rsin(theta) in spherical coordinates and I got the correct answer.
 
well done!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top