Moment of Inertia of a rigid rotating object.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the moment of inertia of a system with two masses attached to a massless rod. The user successfully determined the distance from mass M1 to the center of mass as 1.58 m. They initially inquired about using integrals to find the moment of inertia but were advised that calculus is unnecessary for point masses. Instead, they applied the formula I = 1/3 ML^2 and confirmed the correctness of their answer through a computer check. The conversation highlights the simplicity of calculating moment of inertia for discrete masses without advanced calculus.
asz304
Messages
107
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two small masses are attached to a massless rod of length 2.36 m as shown. Mass M1 is 2.53 kg and mass M2 is 5.16 kg. A) What is the distance, x, from mass M1 to the centre of mass of this system? B) What is the moment of inertia of this system about an axis that passes through the centre of mass and is perpendicular to the rod?


M1------------------(.)----------M2
{--------- x--------}. {---(L-x)-}

(.) is the axis of rotation.

The Attempt at a Solution



I found the answers for question A) using the formula of center of mass and my point of origin was M1.

X = 1.58 m
L-X = 0.78 m

How do I find the moment of inertia if the axis isn't at the middle? If I need to use integrals, can some please show me how? I didn't do integrals yet. thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
asz304 said:
How do I find the moment of inertia if the axis isn't at the middle? If I need to use integrals, can some please show me how? I didn't do integrals yet. thanks
There's no need for any calculus. Treat the small masses as point masses. What's the moment of inertia of a point mass at some distance from an axis?
 
Oh. thanks that made lots of sense. I used I = 1/3 ML^2 , and I got the right answer when I checked the computer.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top