Moment of inertia of a solid of rotation

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the moment of inertia for a solid of rotation formed by rotating the area bounded by the curve x^3+y^3=8 around the y-axis. The initial approach using the formula I_y=M∫(x^2y)dx is deemed incorrect, prompting suggestions to use cylindrical shells instead. Participants emphasize the importance of correctly applying the moment of inertia formula for disks, noting that it should be (1/2)mR^2 rather than mR^2. The correct method involves integrating over the height and accounting for the mass of the entire disk. Overall, the consensus is that using cylindrical shells simplifies the calculation process.
Grand
Messages
74
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The first quadrant area bounded by the curve
x^3+y^3=8
is rotated around y-axis to give a solid of rotation. The question asks for an integral which represents the solid's moment of inertia around the axis.

My answer is:

I_y=M\frac{\int_0^2x^2ydx}{\int_0^2x^2dx}

but seems like I'm wrong. Could someone help me out, please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Last edited by a moderator:
The Moment of Inertial of a cylindrical shell of mass, m, and radius, R, is: m(R2).
 
We need to integrate over the height, that is from 0 to 2, and for each y we need to account for a disk of radius
x=\sqrt[3]{(8-y^3)}
which moment of inertia is:
dI=\rho x^2 dy=\rho (8-y^3)^{2/3}dy
For the whole body this is:
I=\int_0^2\rho (8-y^3)^{2/3} dy
I=\frac{m}{V}\int_0^2 (8-y^3)^{2/3} dy

I think this is wrong.
 
The Moment of Inertial of a disk of mass, m, and radius, R, is: (½)m(R2).

However, I think it would be better to use cylindrical shells as tiny-tim recommended.

The last integral you give, \displaystyle \int_0^2 (8-y^3)^{2/3} dy , gives the volume of your solid of revolution.
 
Last edited:
Hi Grand! :smile:
Grand said:
We need to integrate over the height, that is from 0 to 2, and for each y we need to account for a disk of radius
x=\sqrt[3]{(8-y^3)}
which moment of inertia is:
dI=\rho x^2 dy=\rho (8-y^3)^{2/3}dy

This is wrong for two reasons:

i] the moment of inertia of a disc is 1/2 mr2, not mr2

ii] you can't just use ρ instead of m … you need m for the whole disc, which is ρr2dy, so the whole formula for moment of inertia of the disc is 1/2 ρr4dy

But why are you making things so difficult for yourself? As SammyS :smile: says, cylindrical shells would be much easier.

Try again. :smile:
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
52
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
992
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K