Moment of inertia of a solid sphere calculation

AI Thread Summary
The moment of inertia of a solid sphere with uniform density, rotating about its center, is correctly calculated as 2MR²/5. A derivation using spherical coordinates involves integrating the mass element dm, which is expressed in terms of density and volume. The integral simplifies to a triple integral over the sphere's volume, ultimately leading to the correct formula. For a hollow sphere, the moment of inertia can be derived by subtracting the moment of inertia of an inner solid sphere from that of an outer solid sphere. This method provides a clear and straightforward approach to calculating the moment of inertia for both solid and hollow spheres.
namkot
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
How would one calculate the moment of inertia of a solid sphere (of uniform density, rotating about the axis through its center)? I know it's 2MR^{2}/5 but I got 3MR^{2}/5 when I attempted to derive it (just for fun, because I find rotational dynamics rather interesting). I would prefer a derivation that uses a single integral, which should be very much feasible.

While I'm on the subject, I would like to know how to derive the moment of inertia of a hollow sphere with an infinitely thin shell (again of uniform density, rotating about the axis through its center).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is easiest to do both calculations in cylindrical coordinates (r,φ,z) about the axis of rotation. You have to do two integrations, one in r, and one in z. For a shell, you can do two solid spheres, and subtract one from the other to get a hollow shell.
Bob S
 
Last edited:
The form that this integral will take is

I=\int l^{2}\: dm

Where l is the distance from the axis of rotation.

Sorry, I am too lazy to draw any figures but here is one that will suffice.

spherical-coords.gif


In our case the distance from the axis of rotation (z) is given by

l=rsin\phi

as seen in the figure. We need to find dm now, and it is pretty easy. Use the volume element for spherical coordinates multiplied by the density. This is the little piece of mass.Density is given by

\rho=\frac{M}{\frac{4}{3}\pi R^{3}}So dm is

dm=\rho r^{2}sin\phi dr\:d\theta\:d\phiOur integral turns from this

I=\int l^{2}\: dm

into

I=\int (rsin\phi)^{2}\: \rho r^{2}sin\phi dr\:d\theta\:d\phiOf course this is not a single integral but a triple integral over our entire spherical volume. So

\rho \int^{\pi}_{0}\int^{2\pi}_{0}\int^{R}_{0} (rsin\phi)^{2}\: r^{2}sin\phi dr\:d\theta\:d\phi

And we can condense it some

\rho \int^{\pi}_{0}\int^{2\pi}_{0}\int^{R}_{0} r^{4}sin^{3}\phi \:dr\:d\theta\:d\phi

Now even further

\rho \int^{\pi}_{0}sin^{3}\phi\:d\phi \int^{2\pi}_{0}d\theta \int^{R}_{0} r^{4} \:dr

Solving a couple of the integrals

\frac{\rho2\pi\:R^{5}}{5} \int^{\pi}_{0}sin^{3}\phi\:d\phi

Now we just need to solve the last integral.

\int^{\pi}_{0}sin^{3}\phi\:d\phi

Convert

sin^{2}\phi=1-cos^{2}\phi

So

\int^{\pi}_{0}(1-cos^{2}\phi)sin\phi\:d\phi

Break up the integrals

\int^{\pi}_{0}sin\phi\:d\phi -\int^{\pi}_{0} cos^{2}\phi sin\phi\:d\phiThe first integral is equal to 2, and the second is equal to 2/3

\int^{\pi}_{0}sin\phi\:d\phi -\int^{\pi}_{0} cos^{2}\phi sin\phi\:d\phi=2-\frac{2}{3}=\frac{4}{3}
This means that the total integral (moment of inertia) is

I=\frac{\rho2\pi\:R^{5}}{5}\frac{4}{3}When we substitute in for rho we see that

I=\frac{M}{\frac{4}{3}\pi R^{3}}\frac{2\pi\:R^{5}}{5}\frac{4}{3}Which after canceling yields

I=\frac{2MR^{2}}{5}

If you want it for the case where it is merely a shell, don't do the integration over r, and multiply the result by dr.
 
  • Like
Likes gracy
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top