Moment of Inertia of Compound Disk

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the moment of inertia for a compound disk consisting of a solid inner disk and an outer ring. The inner disk has a radius of 41.0 cm and an area density of 3.30 g/cm², while the outer ring extends from 41.0 cm to 76.0 cm with an area density of 2.10 g/cm². The initial calculations for the moment of inertia yielded 7.87 kg*m², which was incorrect due to miscalculating the outer disk's mass distribution. The correct approach involves treating the outer ring as a solid disk with its mass concentrated between the specified radii, leading to a revised moment of inertia of 11.5 kg*m². This highlights the importance of accurately accounting for mass distribution in compound shapes.
capst
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A compound disk of outside diameter 152 cm is made up of a uniform solid disk of radius 41.0 cm and area density 3.30 g/cm2 surrounded by a concentric ring of inner radius 41.0 cm , outer radius 76.0 cm , and area density 2.10 g/cm2 .

Find the moment of inertia of this object about an axis perpendicular to the plane of the object and passing through its center (in kg*m2).

Homework Equations



Moment of inertia of solid cylinder (a thin cylinder is a disk) = I = .5mr2

The Attempt at a Solution



This object is basically one inner disk with mass mi surrounded by an outer disk with mass mo. Finding the moment of inertia of each of these and adding them together should give the solution.

mi in kg = (area * density)/1000 = (pi*412 *3.3)/1000 = 17.427

mo in kg = [(area - inner area) * density]/1000 = [(pi*712 - pi*412) * 2.1]/1000 = 22.1671

Using the moment of inertia for solid cylinder and adding yields:
.5mi*.412+.5mo*.762= 7.87 kg*m2

The answer given is 11.5 kg*m2. What am I doing wrong?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I assume the 8.76 is a typo for .76. But you have effectively taken the outer disk's mass as being spread over a disk of radius .76. In fact, it is concentrated between .41 and .76 radius, increasing the MI.
The simplest approach would be to treat it as a solid disk radius .76 and density 2.1, plus a solid disk radius .41 and density 3.3-2.1=1.2.
 
Oh, thanks! And yup, fixed the typo.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top