Moment of Inertia of equilateral triangle about vertex

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the moment of inertia of a thin uniform wire bent into an equilateral triangle about an axis through one vertex. The initial calculations incorrectly used the total mass instead of the mass per side, leading to an incorrect result. Clarification was provided that the mass M should be divided by three for each side when calculating individual moments. The correct approach involves applying the parallel axis theorem and Pythagorean theorem to find the necessary distances. Ultimately, the corrected calculations yield the expected moment of inertia value of 1/2 Mb².
oohaithere
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A piece of thin uniform wire of mass m and length 3b is bent into an equilateral triangle. Find the moment of inertia of the wire triangle about an axis perpendicular to the plane of the triangle and passing through one of its vertices.

Homework Equations


Slender rod, axis through one end: I=\frac 1 3ML2
Parallel axis theorem: Ip=Icm+Md2
Slender rod, axis through center: I=\frac {1} {12}ML2

The Attempt at a Solution


First I drew the figure as an equilateral triangle with the axis at the top point and set each side equal to B.[/B]

34qlqms.jpg


Then I considered the 2 sides to be slender rods with the axis through one end.
So, ΣI=\frac 1 3Mb2+\frac 1 3Mb2

The third side I figured would be a slender rod with the axis in the middle but moved up a distance d which would equal \sqrt{ b^2- {\frac 1 4} b^2 }.

Ip=\frac {1} {12}Mb2+M\sqrt{ b^2- {\frac 1 4} b^2 }2

Then I added them all up to get the moment of inertia for the whole triangle.

ΣI=\frac 1 3Mb2+\frac 1 3Mb2+\frac {1} {12}Mb2+Mb2-\frac 1 4Mb2

But I get \frac 3 2Mb2 when the answer is supposed to be \frac 1 2Mb2.

Am I maybe missing a negative or calculating one of the moments wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello there, haithere, :welcome:
Is M the mass of one side, or of the whole thing ?
 
  • Like
Likes oohaithere
BvU said:
Hello there, haithere, :welcome:
Is M the mass of one side, or of the whole thing ?
M is the mass of the whole wire so should I be using M/3 for the value of M in each moment I'm adding?
edit: I tried it and it works thanks for pointing that out
 
can you show how you found the distance d?
'
 
Hello Muz, :welcome:

Thing to do in PF is start your own thread instead of continuing someone else's solved thread.

Never mind: if you cut an equilateral triangle (sides length b) in half you can use Pythagoras to find ##d^2 = b^2 - ({1\over 2}b)^2 \ \ ##
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top