Moment of Inertia of half disk

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the mass moment of inertia for a half disk spinning around its center axis. The formula for a full disk is I=1/2*M*R^2, and it is clarified that the moment of inertia for the half disk is indeed half of this value due to the reduced mass. There is some initial confusion regarding the rotation not being through the center of gravity (COG), but it is confirmed that the same formula applies. The key takeaway is that the moment of inertia for the half disk simplifies to half that of the full disk because it has half the mass. This understanding helps in accurately determining the inertia for practical applications.
Brad123
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello, just found this forum didn't know it existed. hopefully someone can help with this.

I am trying to figure out the mass moment of inertia for a half disk spining around the center axis. A full disk is I=1/2*M*R^2. Would the inertia for spining a half disk around the center axis just be half of this? Not homework, something I am working on.

Hopefully someone here can help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Brad123 said:
I am trying to figure out the mass moment of inertia for a half disk spining around the center axis. A full disk is I=1/2*M*R^2. Would the inertia for spining a half disk around the center axis just be half of this?
Yes.

Just to be clear: The formula will be the same, but since the mass is halved, the moment of inertia will be halved.
 
Thanks for the quick responce. What was confusing me was that the half disk is rotating around what is the center (not COG) I thought it might get more complicated due to the rotation not being through the COG. thanks just 1/2 the formula for a full disk because it is half the mass. Here is an image for reference. Apreciated. (I am ignoring the small attachment point for simplicity)
 

Attachments

  • half_disk.jpg
    half_disk.jpg
    7.9 KB · Views: 525
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top