Moment of inertia of rug beater

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the moment of inertia for two models of rug beaters to determine which is easier to use. Model A features a 1m handle and a 40cm square, while Model B has a 0.75m handle and a 30cm square, with different mass distributions. Participants discuss using the formula for the moment of inertia of a rod and the need to apply the parallel axis theorem for the square component. The importance of identifying the rotational axis and its relation to the center of mass is emphasized for accurate calculations. Overall, the focus is on understanding the physics principles to solve the problem effectively.
man_in_motion
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


There are 2 models of rugbeaters. Model A has a 1m long handle and a 40cm edge length square. The handles mass is 1kg and the squares mass is 0.5kg. Model B has a 0.75m long handle and a square that has 30cm edge length. The mass of the handle is 1.5kg and the mass of the square is 0.6kg. Which model is easier to use?

Homework Equations


I=\Sigma m_i r^2_i=\int r^2 dm
the rod has inertia of
I=\frac{1}{3}ML^2


The Attempt at a Solution


I break the problem into 2 parts: the handle and the square.
The handle can be found using I=\frac{1}{3}ML^2
I'm not sure how to find the inertia of the square part, it's distance is growing longer away from the axis of rotation. I'm guessing I'm going to have to calculate an integral.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You can use the parallel axis theorem. By the way, how did you make it show up in the google search?
 
how would using the parallel axis theorem help? I don't know what u mean about the google search.
 
Hey, I saw your post in Physics Help Forum as well. Are you still stuck with the question? If you had shown that you tried for the square part like you did in that Forum, I would have followed up.
Anyway, the rotational axis is at the end of handle as we know. Before we shift the rotational axis to the centre of mass and apply the parallel axis theorem, it's important to know the orientation of the square relative to the rotational axis. If we shift it, the axis goes through two thin edges. If you can figure out the moment of inertia at that axis, you can apply the theorem. Now try it.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top