Moment of inertia tensor of an electron?

tiny-tim
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
25,837
Reaction score
258
Does a free electron have a moment of inertia tensor? :blushing:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmm. Thats an interesting question.
Well since the electron is considered as a point particle, I don't think we can distinguish any "axis" of spinning in the classical sense.
But since there is the purely quantum mechanical effect of spin, maybe we can define some "moment of inertia" likeish tensor, which is also purely quantum mechanical...
 
The electron has spin angular momentum s=\hbar/2.
But that is QM spin which does not come from rotation of the electron.
That is, the electron has angular momentum, but no angular velocity.
Moment of inertia is defined by L=I\omega,
so moment of inertial cannot be defined for an electron.
 
Yes, in the classical sense of course it cannot be defined, but in the classical sense spin is also non sensical since the electron is a point particle.
But in the QM sense the electron has spin, hence in the QM there is a possibility of defining some QM "moment of inertia"..., but most probably there would be no use of defining it...
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
964
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
771
Back
Top