MHB Moment of Inertia: Use Parallel Axis Theorem

AI Thread Summary
To determine the moment of inertia of a uniform disc about the x-axis using the parallel axis theorem, one must first calculate the moment of inertia about the center of the disc. The parallel axis theorem states that the moment of inertia about any axis parallel to one through the center of mass can be found by adding the moment of inertia about the center of mass to the product of the mass and the square of the distance between the two axes. For a uniform disc, the moment of inertia about the center is (1/2)MR², and the distance from the center to the edge is R. Therefore, the moment of inertia about the x-axis is (1/2)MR² + MR², resulting in (3/2)MR².
Peter Gikonyo
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Use a parallel axis theorem to determine the moment of inertia of a uniform disc of mass M and radius R about the x-axis perpendicular to the plane of the disc and passing at the edge of the disc.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello and welcome to MHB! :D

We ask that our users show their progress (work thus far or thoughts on how to begin) when posting questions. This way our helpers can see where you are stuck or may be going astray and will be able to post the best help possible without potentially making a suggestion which you have already tried, which would waste your time and that of the helper.

Can you post what you have done so far?
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top