Moment of Intertia, proving Parralel axis theorum. Help please.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the moment of inertia (I) for an equilateral triangle rotated about the z-axis, with a constant depth (d). The initial calculations involve integrating to find I using the density (p) and volume (V) relationships. A new scenario is introduced where the triangle's vertex is displaced from the z-axis, leading to a piecewise function for B(r). The user seeks guidance on generalizing the method for various shapes and questions the validity of their approach, emphasizing the need for a clear understanding of the moment of inertia as a vector quantity. The conversation highlights the complexities of applying the parallel axis theorem in this context.
Starwatcher16
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
Imagine we have a Equilateral triangle in the xy plane with one vertex at the origin. The triangle will be rotated about the z axis. The depth of the triangle, d, will be constant.B_r=B(r)

From the picture I see that B_r=\frac{r}{h}B , V=\frac{B_rhd}{2}=\frac{Bdr}{2}

First, I need to find I.

<br /> I=\sum M_i*r_i^2=\int r^2 dm. p=M/V, so, dp=p dv

<br /> I=p\int r^2 dv Substituting usingdp=p dv and dv=\frac{Bd}{2}dr, we get:

<br /> I=\frac{pBd}{2}*\int r^2 dr=\frac{pBd}{2}*\frac{r^3}{3}. Using p=M/V:
<br /> I=\frac{Mr^3}{3h}=\frac{Mr^2}{3}. R_total/h=1.

Now, let's say I want to find I for the same shape, but now there is a distance d from the vertex to the z axis.

Everything is the same as the above, except, B_r is now a piecewise function, where B(r)=0 for r<d and B(r)=B_r=\frac{r-d}{h}B for r&gt;d.

Reworking it with the new B_r, I can get the new I. After that I just solve for x in I_2=I_1+x to get the parallel axis theorem.

The thing is, I don't know how to generalize this one example to work for all shapes. Any help is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Lets pretend that whoever answers my question get free cookies.

Also, now that I think about it, I am not sure this method is valid.
 
Yes picking a shape will not help you prove the theorem. What is the definition of the moment of inertia? Note that it is a vector quantity. Now displace the axis a distance d away from the original axis, note that d is a vector too.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top