Moments & Pendulum: Different Lengths, Same Oscillation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sgstudent
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Moments Pendulum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between forces, moments, and pendulum oscillation periods. It confirms that the addition of moments from two forces acting at different angles can be expressed as r x a + r x b = r x (a + b). The conversation also explores why pendulums of different lengths have varying oscillation times, emphasizing that a longer pendulum covers a greater distance, resulting in a longer period. The mathematical explanation provided indicates that the period of a pendulum is directly proportional to its length, derived from the motion equations. Thus, longer pendulums inherently take more time to complete an oscillation.
sgstudent
Messages
726
Reaction score
3
if i have two forces acting at two different angles at a same spot will the addition of the moments of the two forces be the same as the moment whereby i take the net force of the two forces and get the moment of the net force of the same two forces?

is there a way to explain why for the same mass of the bob, two different lengths of the pendulum will have different times to have a complete oscillation using moments to explain it. Thanks for the help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi sgstudent! :smile:
sgstudent said:
if i have two forces acting at two different angles at a same spot will the addition of the moments of the two forces be the same as the moment whereby i take the net force of the two forces and get the moment of the net force of the same two forces?

yes … r x a + r x b = r x (a + b) :wink:
is there a way to explain why for the same mass of the bob, two different lengths of the pendulum will have different times to have a complete oscillation using moments to explain it.

yes, the moment tells you the angular acceleration :smile:
 
tiny-tim said:
hi sgstudent! :smile:


yes … r x a + r x b = r x (a + b) :wink:


yes, the moment tells you the angular acceleration :smile:

Thanks tiny Tim. However, I don't really know the explanation using moments on why a longer pendulum will have longer periods than shorter ones. Since they are longer so won't their moment be greater? Thanks! :smile:
 
The longer the pendulum, the longer the distance it has to cover to complete one period. Why would you think the time to cover this longer distance would be shorter?

If you want a detailed answer:
Suppose the pedulum has mass m centered at distance L from the pivot. There is a downward force of strength -mg. But the pendulum mass can only move around the circumference of the circle or radius L and the component of force parallel to the circumference is -mg sin(\theta) where \theta is the angle the pendulum makes with the vertical.

If we measure \theta in radians, the angle \theta corresponds to a distance around the arc of s= L\theta and so the linear velocity is v= ds/dt= L d\theta/dt and the acceleration is a= dv/dt= L d^2/theta/dt^2. Since "mass times acceleration= force", the motion is given by
ma= mL d^\theta/dt^2= -mg cos(\theta)

That is a badly "non-linear" equation so there is no simple exact solution but there are a number of ways to approximate it. One is to note that for small angles, cos(\theta) is approximately \theta itself so we can approximate the equation by
mLd^2\theta/dt^2= -mg\theta

That is a second order linear equation with constant coefficients. It has "characteristic equation" Lr^2=-g which has "characteristic roots" \pm\sqrt{g/L}. That, turn, tells us that two independent solutions are sin(\sqrt{gt/L} and cos(\sqrt{gt/L}. That will have period given by gt/L= 2\pi so that t= 2L/g which is directly proportional to L- the larger L, the longer the period.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top