Momentum and penetration depth

bernhard.rothenstein
Messages
991
Reaction score
1
Many textbooks derive the relativistic momentum from the penetration depth of a bullet in a resistive media, considering that momentum is proportional with the penetration depth. Do you know a transparent and correct way to the problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bullets are of such relatively large mass and low velocity that relativistic mechanics does not apply, rather classical mechanics is appropriate.

The problem is one of energy transfer as well as momentum, and the actual problem is not so simple in general. It is relatively simple, and more a matter of the properties of the resistive material, e.g. density and viscosity, if the bullet does not deform, although bullet shape and diameter would be a factor.

See - http://www.angelfire.com/art/enchanter/terminal.html (bad link to physics forums archives)

There is a thread on Physics Forums that addresses this issue of terminal ballistics and stopping power.

Momentum is just the rate of change of force, and that is a function of the shear stresses, as well as the density of the resistive media and mass of the bullet.
 
thanks

thanks for your answer. The problem has a pedagogic value, because if the penetration is proportional to the momentum then an y penetration ensures the invariance of the y component of the momentum.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top