Momentum Operators and the Schwartz Integrability Condition

DreadyPhysics
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Hi All,

When computing the commutator \left[x,p_{y}\right], I eventually arrived (as expected) at \hbar^{2}\left(\frac{\partial}{\partial y}\left(\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}\right) - \frac{\partial}{\partial x}\left(\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}\right)\right) and I realized that, as correct as it seems, I couldn't figure exactly why these two values should equal each other and thus set the commutator equal to 0. I know that they do- I knew the answer ahead of time - but at this step, I was at a loss to prove that the differential operators themselves commute. It would seem conceivable to me that they might not in some circumstances.

I looked into it a bit and it turns out that this hinges on the Schwartz Integrability Condition (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symmetry_of_second_derivatives). However, the article is a little unclear to me. Is this a general property of two-dimensional functions, or by assuming it are we limiting ourselves to a specific domain of functions?

The article mentions even that in physics specifically, sometimes we suspend the condition and allow functions to violate it. Does anyone have any examples of this specifically in a physical context? And, if we suspend the condition here, won't it make the momentum operators non-commuting? Wouldn't that would have specific physical consequences?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
DreadyPhysics said:
it turns out that this hinges on the Schwartz Integrability Condition (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symmetry_of_second_derivatives). However, the article is a little unclear to me. Is this a general property of two-dimensional functions, or by assuming it are we limiting ourselves to a specific domain of functions?
The strongest version of this statement "equality of mixed partials" that I know of, i.e. the one with the weakest hypotheses, is stated here.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Landau said:
The strongest version of this statement "equality of mixed partials" that I know of, i.e. the one with the weakest hypotheses, is stated here.

Excellent, that answers my question. Thank you very much.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top