Moon Question (Vacuum, air, escape vel.)

AI Thread Summary
The moon lacks an atmosphere due to its low mass and biological inactivity, which prevents it from retaining gases. Consequently, it exists within the vacuum of space, where the absence of air is a defining characteristic. Despite having no atmosphere, the moon still possesses gravity, which is why a person would not drift off into space after jumping. The moon's core has cooled and is inactive, unlike other celestial bodies like Europa, which can off-gas due to tectonic activity. Ultimately, the moon's inability to maintain an atmosphere is attributed to historical solar wind effects.
nukeman
Messages
651
Reaction score
0
Ok, this might seem like a silly question, but I just want to get it straight. Just tell me if anything I am saying is wrong, and answer the best you can.

Ok, the moon has no air, because it has no atmosphere correct? And the reason for no atmosphere is because the moon is biologically non-active, and the moon does not have enough mass to keep things from escaping the moon, including gases, which the moon does not give off because its biologically dead ?

The moon is simply apart of the vacuum of space because of the atmosphere correct?

So, the reason someone on the moon would not drift off into space if they jumped in the air is because the moon still of course has gravity, as everything with mass has gravity.


Now its your turn :)

Thanks guys!
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
nukeman said:
Ok, the moon has no air, because it has no atmosphere correct?

Having an atmosphere doesn't necessarily mean having air...

The moon is simply apart of the vacuum of space because of the atmosphere correct?

This doesn't make much sense to me either. "Apart of the vacuum of space?" Vacuum is, by crude definition, the absence of matter.

So, the reason someone on the moon would not drift off into space if they jumped in the air is because the moon still of course has gravity, as everything with mass has gravity.

Right.
 
fss covered most of it. A few tweaks:
nukeman said:
And the reason for no atmosphere is because the moon is biologically non-active, and the moon does not have enough mass to keep things from escaping the moon, including gases, which the moon does not give off because its biologically dead ?
Planets certainly off-gas without being biologically active. Europa is spewing sulphur clouds from its interior.

But Europa is tectonically active; it has a liquid core. The Moon's core has long since cooled and is now dead. That's why it does not off-gas.


nukeman said:
So, the reason someone on the moon would not drift off into space if they jumped in the air is because the moon still of course has gravity, as everything with mass has gravity.
Well, of course, they couldn't "jump in the air" on the Moon, could they? :wink:

But yes, gravity is what holds things down, not atmo.
 
DaveC426913 said:
fss covered most of it. A few tweaks:

Planets certainly off-gas without being biologically active. Europa is spewing sulphur clouds from its interior.

But Europa is tectonically active; it has a liquid core. The Moon's core has long since cooled and is now dead. That's why it does not off-gas.

Io is the volcanic one. It has a thin atmosphere of mostly sulfur dioxide from all the sulfur and the like. During Io's night the atmosphere freezes, then defrosts just after dawn. Europa has a very, very thin atmosphere of oxygen, from ice that has been exposed to Jupiter's radiation belt and broken into oxygen and hydrogen.


Well, of course, they couldn't "jump in the air" on the Moon, could they? :wink:

But yes, gravity is what holds things down, not atmo.

The Moon BTW doesn't have an atmosphere because it was blown away, long ago, by the Solar Wind.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Back
Top