More set fun, can u see if i'm right?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mr_coffee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fun Set
mr_coffee
Messages
1,613
Reaction score
1
Hello everyone 'im not sure if this is right or not, its about 4:00am so bare with me on typos.
Let S = {a,b,c} and let S_a be the set of all subsets of S that contain a, let S_b be the set of all subsets of S that contain b, let S_c be the set of all subsets of S that contain c, and let S_null be the set whoese only element is Null. Is {S_a, S_b, S_c, S_NULL} a partion of P(S).

I said:

No, {S_a, S_b, S_c, S_NULL} is not a partion of P(s) becuase S != S_a U S_b U S_C U S_NULL. All the sets must also be mutally disjoint to be a partition so it can't be a parition of P(S).

P stands for power set.

Thanks, if I'm wrong can you tell me what I'm mess up on or misunderstanding. There arn't any examples like this in the book to help me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's true that S \neq S_a \cup S_b \cup S_c \cup S_{\emptyset } but this is irrelevant. It so happens that \mathcal{P}(S) = S_a \cup S_b \cup S_c \cup S_{\emptyset }, but this is also irrelevant. Since the sets in \{S_a,\, S_b,\, S_c,\, S_{\emptyset }\} are not mutually disjoint, they do not partition \mathcal{P}(S).
 
Thanks for the help AKG! :biggrin:
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Back
Top