Morphism which preserves convolution?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mnb96
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Convolution
mnb96
Messages
711
Reaction score
5
Hello,
I was wondering if there exists a (iso)morphism which preserves the operation of convolution, in respect to the pointwise-addition operation.
For example: it is well known that the Discrete Fourier Transform is a morphism which preserves convolution in respect to pointwise-multiplication:
F(f\ast g) = F(f)\cdot F(g)

Is it possible to find another operator \mathcal{G} (different than the FT) for which the following is valid?
\mathcal{G}(f\ast g) = \mathcal{G}(f)+\mathcal{G}(g)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just looking I would say if you defined G(f) = ln(F(f)), then you would have G(f*g) = ln(F(f)F(g)) = ln(F(f)) + ln(F(g)) = G(f) + G(g).

Right?
 
Matticus thanks for your reply!
I am quite amazed for the fact that I didn't figure out that before. In fact, I think your suggestion makes perfectly sense.
Moreover, if we restrict ourselves to the discrete domain, taking the logarithm of the DFT would be equivalent to applying a coordinate transformation of the kind:

\bar{x_i} = log(x_i)

x_i = e^{\bar{x_i}}

and if I am not wrong, the Jacobian of such a transformation is never 0. This would imply that it is a one-to-one mapping, and so an isomorphism. I guess this observation could be applied as well to continuous functions, but I don't know how.
Does it make sense?
 
...uhm, actually there are problems is one is looking for an isomorphism. The isomorphism I mentioned with the log transformation is perfectly valid only in the domain of real positive numbers. Now, the Fourier transform outputs complex numbers, including real negative numbers and zero, so two problems arise:

1) the logarithm of a negative number can have multiple values
2) the logarithm of zero is not defined

The first problem can be solved by considering only the principal first branch of the negative logarithm, and that's fine.

But how can one ensure that the Fourier transform has always non-zero components?
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top