Most Probable Speed - Atoms From An Oven

  • Thread starter Thread starter bobbles22
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atoms oven Speed
AI Thread Summary
To find the most probable speed of atoms ejected from an oven at 900°C, the relevant formula is vmp=√(2kT/m). The user is seeking clarification on the correct value for the Boltzmann constant (k), which is 1.38e-23 J/K in SI units. The mass of one aluminium molecule is calculated as 0.027 kg/mol divided by Avogadro's number (6.022e23). Using these values, the expected velocity aligns with the user's expectation of "hundreds of m/s." This confirms the calculations are on the right track for determining atomic speeds.
bobbles22
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Hi there,

I'm looking to find the most probable speed of atoms ejected from an oven.

Temp (T) is 900°C (so 1173.15K).

The material is aluminium with molar mass 0.027kg mol-1

I've got the formula vmp=√(2kT/m)

I'm fine with everything above, but I'm not sure what value to use as the Boltzmann constant k.

Can anyone please help me here? Do I have the right equation and what value for the constant should I use (sounds silly, but it changes depending upon units. I've tried a couple but get silly tiny speeds out. I think I should expect something in the region of a few hundred metres per second).

Many thanks

Bob
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In SI units:
K = 1.38e-23 J/K
m = mass of one molecule = 0.027/6.022e23 kg
T = 1173 K

... which gives a velocity of "hundreds of m/s" as you expected.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top