Motion equation of moving particle

  • Thread starter Thread starter qoqosz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Motion Particle
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the motion equation of a particle, specifically analyzing the scenario when the frequency parameters \(\omega\) and \(\gamma\) are equal. As \(\gamma\) approaches \(\omega\), the amplitude of oscillations increases significantly, suggesting that at the exact equality, the amplitude could be infinite. However, when substituting \(\omega = \gamma\) into the original equation, the resulting solution indicates that while the function grows to infinity over time, it does not exhibit infinite amplitude. The application of L'Hospital's rule reveals that the amplitude remains finite despite the growth of the oscillation. This leads to a deeper inquiry into the contrasting behaviors of the system as \(\gamma\) approaches \(\omega\) versus when they are equal.
qoqosz
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Hi,
assume that motion equation of moving particle are given by:
\ddot{x} + \omega^2 x = \frac{f}{m} \cos ( \gamma t + \beta )​
the solution is of course x = a \cos (\omega t + \alpha) + \tfrac{f}{m(\omega^2 - \gamma^2)} \cos ( \gamma t + \beta).

My question is - what exactly happens when \omega = \gamma ?

As \gamma \to \omega but \omega \not= \gamma the amplitude of oscillations grows rapidly, right?
We might guess that when \omega = \gamma aplitude is infinite! But... let's right x as:
x = b \cos (\omega t + \alpha) + \frac{f}{m(\omega^2 - \gamma^2)} \left\{ \cos ( \gamma t + \beta) - \cos (\omega t + \beta) \right\}​
.
(b is a new const). In the second term of the sum we have 0/0 symbol and using de L'Hospital rule we obtain
x = b \cos (\omega t + \alpha) + \frac{f}{2m \omega} t \sin (\omega t + \beta)​
This function grows to infinity as t \to \infty but not so fast and it of course has a finite amplitude.

So again - what exactly happens when \omega = \gamma ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Why don't you try to set them equal in the original equation and solve that.
 


I did that and got solution of the form x = b \cos (\omega t + \alpha) + \frac{f}{2m \omega} t \sin (\omega t + \beta) again.
But I still wonder why when \gamma \to \omega the amplitude can be very very large and when \gamma = \omega it is totally different.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top