Motion & Forces: Speed of Block 5.90s After Start

  • Thread starter Thread starter anastasiaw
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces Motion
AI Thread Summary
A 5.82 kg block on a frictionless floor is pulled by a force of 12.80 N at an angle of 24.0°, resulting in a calculated acceleration. The horizontal component of the force is 11.69 N, leading to an acceleration of 2.01 m/s², while the vertical component contributes to a separate acceleration of 0.895 m/s². After 5.90 seconds, the block's speed is determined using the equation v(t) = v0 + at, yielding a speed of approximately 12.98 m/s. However, a correction reveals that the correct speed is closer to 11.85 m/s due to a miscalculation in the force components. The discussion highlights the importance of accurately applying trigonometric functions in physics calculations.
anastasiaw
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
A 5.82 kg block located on a horizontal frictionless floor is pulled by a cord that exerts a force F = 12.80 N at an angle θ = 24.0° above the horizontal as shown. What is the speed of the block 5.90 seconds after it starts moving?

http://img239.imageshack.us/img239/1153/prob49dj7.gif

F = ma
Fx = Fcosθ
Fy = Fsinθ
v(t) = v0 + at

Fx = 12.8cos24 = 11.69 N
Fx = m*ax ax = 2.01 m/s^2
vx(t) = 0 + 2.01(5.9) = 11.859 m/s

Fy = 12.8sin24 = 5.21 N
Fy = m*ay ay = 0.895 m/s^2
vy(t) = 0 + (.895)(5.9) = 5.2805 m/s

v(t)^2 = vx(t)^2 + vy(t)^2 = 11.859^2 + 5.2805^2
v(t) = 12.98 m/s
I entered 13.0 m/s into LONCAPA and it told me it was incorrect. What am I doing wrong?

Edit: Also tried a simpler way:

F=ma
12.8=5.82a
a=2.20m/s
v=v0+at
v=0+2.20(5.9)
v=12.98m/s
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The second method is satisfactory.

YOU ARE MAKING A SIMPLE MISTAKE:

cos24 degrees=.9135

>>force=12.80 * .9135 = 11.69N

now a= 11.69/5.82 = 2.009 m/s^2

>v= v0+at

>0+2.009*5.90

>v= 11.854 m/s
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top