Motion in a Central Gravitational Force

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on analyzing the motion of a particle influenced by a central inverse-square-law force combined with an additional force inversely proportional to the cube of the distance from the center. The force is expressed as F(r) = -k/r² - λ/r³, where both k and λ are positive constants. Participants emphasize the need to derive the motion's differential equation and suggest utilizing a previously learned equation related to known orbits. The challenge lies in manipulating the left-hand side of the equation to facilitate solving the differential equation. Ultimately, the goal is to demonstrate that the resulting motion is characterized by a precessing ellipse.
Macykc2
Messages
13
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Discuss the motion of a particle in a central inverse-square-law force field for a superimposed force whose magnitude is inversely proportional to the cube of the distance from the particle to the force center, that is:
F(r) = -k/r2 - λ/r3 and k,λ>0​
Show that the motion is described by a precessing ellipse.

Homework Equations


The one given in the question

The Attempt at a Solution


I honestly don't know where to begin, we derived an equation in class that we could find the force law if a particular known orbit r=r(θ), and I was thinking of using it:
(d2/dθ2)(1/r) + (1/r) = -μr2F(r)/l2
but I don't know what to do with the left hand side, but again it's just a guess as to what to start with.
Sorry for not using the math commands, they didn't want to work for some reason.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to solve the differential equation.

For equations, you can type out LaTeX markup directly.

You may want to back up a bit and make sure you understand the motivation for deriving the equation you used in the first place... see if the same approach still applies here.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top