Motion in two dimensions question. At wit's end.

AI Thread Summary
A user struggled with a physics problem involving projectile motion, specifically calculating the minimum time of flight for a projectile with an initial speed of 80 m/s to hit a target 450 m away. The challenge stemmed from the absence of an angle, leading to difficulties in eliminating variables. The solution required understanding that the projectile's ascent and descent must take equal time, prompting the user to derive equations for both horizontal and vertical motion. After receiving guidance, the user successfully solved the problem by applying trigonometric identities to find the angle. The discussion highlights the importance of combining equations in projectile motion to address variable dependencies.
Hekmat123
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Motion in two dimensions question. At wit's end.

Hi, I'll try to keep this short. I have a Physics exam tomorrow and was doing some textbook questions and can't figure out this one problem. It's killing me! I have the answer (supplied by the back of the book), but just can't seem to get there.

Some help would be much appreciated since I've grown very frustrated with it.


Homework Statement



The initial speed of a projectile is 80 m/s. If the projectile is to strike a target that is a horizontal distance of 450 m away, what is the minimum time of flight. (Answer 6.1s)

Homework Equations



Standard laws of motion ignoring air resistance and the like

X(final) = X(initial) + V(initial) (t) + 0.5at^2


The Attempt at a Solution



I've tried everything I can think of. What's shutting me down every time is that there is no angle supplied so I'm always stuck with two variables I can't eliminate.

Obviously the answer must lie in finding the smallest angle possible for a projectile at 80 m/s to reach 450 meters, I just can't figure out how. I came up with this equation from the formula above, but I have no clue how to use it as my brain is just shutting down at this point (maybe it's useless i don't know, argh!)

450 = 0 +80(cos(alpha))t = 0
t= 5.625/cos(alpha)



If someone could help me get this problem you would earn my undying admiration, and I'll mail you a cookie!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Take a step back. The target is 450m away, so the time it takes to get there is what you calculated in terms of alpha. The other constraint is that the projectile has to go up for half of the flight, and back down for the other half of the flight, in order to hit the target. That up and down motion has to take the same total time t.

You'll probably get a 2nd order equation, since there are probably two answers (low angle shot < 45 degrees, and high angle shot > 45 degrees)
 
You already have an equation for the horizontal position as a function of time. Now write an equation for the vertical position as a function of time. Combine those equations to eliminate the angle and solve for the time.
 
Thanks for the help! I'm going to try it again and I'll post back, hopefully to add a solved tag , heh.
 
Finally managed it. Thanks for the help guys. All I had to do was use the sin/cos identities to solve for alpha, I feel retarded, thanks again!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top