Motorcycle Accident - Coefficient of Friction issues

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the initial speed of a motorcycle involved in an accident, where it traveled on its side for 200 meters on a dry, uphill road with a 10-degree grade. Key variables include the motorcycle's weight of approximately 145 kg and the coefficient of friction of asphalt, estimated between 0.3 and 0.5. The initial speed can be calculated using the formula v = sqrt(2gd(0.1+μ)), with μ representing the coefficient of friction. The minimum estimated speed, assuming no friction, is around 60 mph, while factoring in friction suggests a speed of about 90 mph. Accurate calculations depend heavily on the coefficient of friction and the gradient of the road.
pmoon.pt
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi Everyone,

I'm trying to find the initial speed of a motorcycle that was involved in an accident. The driver lost control and the bike dragged along the asphalt for some distance. I know several variables but my physics is not a strong suit to say the least. Any help would be much appreciated!

Here is what I know:

- bike traveled on its side (independently of the driver) for 200 meters
- nothing but the friction of the road brought the bike to a stop
- grade of the road - uphill approx 10 degrees
- motorbike weight - approx 145 kg
- dry road
- coefficient of friction of asphalt?

I'd like to know several things:
- the initial speed
- the formula used to find the initial speed
- if the type (i.e. rubber vs metal vs plastic) of contact points and actual surface area of the contact points of the bike on the asphalt make a difference for this calculation and if so how would that factor into the formula? Negligible? Can reasonable assumptions be made for a reasonably accurate initial speed?

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You could get an estimate of the minimum bike speed by assuming no friction at all.

The bike climbs 200 x sin 10 degrees = about 35 meters

The starting speed to "free wheel" up the hill is given by v = sqrt(2gh) = 26 m/s or about 60 mph minimum.

I don't think you can do much more than that, without a lot more information.

Note: when you say "grade: uphill about 10 degrees" are you sure about that? That's a very steep hill. If you mean the grade is "10:1" that would reduce the speed estimate to about 45 mph minimum.
 
Last edited:
Thanks Aleph, that's very helpful!

Yes I meant 10:1
 
The frictional aspect is likely to be the more important. Based on various other metal/nonmetal combinations, if the road was clean and dry I would expect a coefficient of around .4 to .5. Let's say it was at least .3. With a gradient of 0.1, that makes it three times as significant. v = sqrt(2gd(0.1+0.3)) = sqrt(2*10*200*0.4) m/s = 40 m/s = 90mph. Any chance of getting a better estimate for mu?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top