Move a mass on frictionless surface in a vacuum chamber

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

To move one kilogram of mass horizontally for one meter on a perfectly frictionless surface inside a vacuum chamber, the energy required is contingent upon the acceleration desired and the time taken to cover that distance. A minimal force, even in the microNewton range, can initiate movement, but the time duration of that force application is critical. The mass of the object does influence the energy required to move it, particularly when comparing different weights, as kinetic energy is a function of mass and velocity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Basic principles of kinetic energy
  • Concept of force and acceleration
  • Frictionless motion in a vacuum environment
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Newton's second law of motion in detail
  • Explore the relationship between force, mass, and acceleration
  • Learn about kinetic energy calculations and their implications
  • Investigate the effects of varying mass on energy requirements in motion
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, engineers, and anyone interested in the principles of motion in a frictionless environment.

Dante Meira
Messages
22
Reaction score
5
How much energy is necessary to move one kilogram of mass horizontally for one meter on a perfectly frictionless surface inside a vacuum chamber?

Assuming the initial velocity of the mass is zero, the mass is at rest.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Dante Meira said:
How much energy is necessary to move one kilogram of mass horizontally for one meter on a perfectly frictionless surface inside a vacuum chamber?

Assuming the initial velocity of the mass is zero, the mass is at rest.
What are your thoughts on this?
 
Chestermiller said:
What are your thoughts on this?

I guess the energy needed will depend on the time you want the mass to take to move that one meter. If you use little energy, the one kilogram mass will accelerate less and will take more time to move one meter. The more energy you use, more the one kilogram mass will accelerate, and it will take less time to move one meter horizontally.

But I wonder if there is a minimal bound in how much energy is needed to make the one kilogram mass start to move from rest on an frictionless horizontal surface in a chamber with no air resistance.

If you apply a very small force (microNewtons) for just a very brief moment (microsseconds) will that be enough to move the one kilogram mass from rest? Will it start to move horizontally in a frictionless environment, even if in a very slow speed?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
Dante Meira said:
If you apply a very small force (microNewtons) for just a very brief moment (microsseconds) will that be enough to move the one kilogram mass from rest? Will it start to move?
What is the net force on the object? What does Newton's second law say about this situation?

After you're done applying this small force for a short time... what does Newton's first law say about the motion of the object?
 
The object is at rest and the only force applied is this small force for a small amount of time, in a direction parallel to the ground.

What I really want to know is: in this case, will the mass of the object have any effect on the energy necessary to move the object one meter in a given period of time?

For example: in the same vacuum chamber with no air resistance and with perfectly frictionless surface, we put two objects of the same volume and shape, but with different densities, so one of them weights one kilogram, and the other weights 20 kilograms. Considering no friction at all (not even from air) and horizontal movement (in relation to gravity, that is: not "against" gravity and not in the direction of gravity, but neutral), and supposing we want to move the two objects one meter in 10 seconds, will it be necessary to use more energy to move the 20 kg object than the 1 kg object?

That's my doubt.
 
Dante Meira said:
The object is at rest and the only force applied is this small force for a small amount of time, in a direction parallel to the ground.

What I really want to know is: in this case, will the mass of the object have any effect on the energy necessary to move the object one meter in a given period of time?
What is the smallest number greater than zero?
 
Dante Meira said:
What I really want to know is: in this case, will the mass of the object have any effect on the energy necessary to move the object one meter in a given period of time?
That is a different question than you asked in your first post. To answer this one you'll want to consider the speed of the object as it passes the one meter point, and what that says about its kinetic energy.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K