bobie
Gold Member
- 720
- 2
From conservation of kinetic energy we get:
$$\frac{i \omega _0^2}{2}+\frac{m v_0^2}{2}=\frac{i \omega _1^2}{2}+\frac{m
v_1^2}{2}$$
From conservation of angular momentum we get:
$$ i \omega _0+m r v_0=i \omega _1+m r v_1 $$
From conservation of linear momentum we get:
$$ mv_0 + mv_1 = Mv_r → 22 + 11.85 = 33.85 → v_r = 3.385 → E_k = 57.29 J $$
1) the rod has reacted in the same way 10/3 both with and without fulcrum.
2) I know I am asking too much, but as they found that a rod has I = 1/12, they might have studied that 1/12 corrsponds to 1/3 of the real mass in the collision. That would have made things easier and we might have got immediately ##v_1 = 7/13 v_0 = 11.85 , v_r = 20/ (13[*M]) = 3.385##
$$\frac{i \omega _0^2}{2}+\frac{m v_0^2}{2}=\frac{i \omega _1^2}{2}+\frac{m
v_1^2}{2}$$
From conservation of angular momentum we get:
$$ i \omega _0+m r v_0=i \omega _1+m r v_1 $$
From conservation of linear momentum we get:
$$ mv_0 + mv_1 = Mv_r → 22 + 11.85 = 33.85 → v_r = 3.385 → E_k = 57.29 J $$
DaleSpam said:1) We know that the rod will not react in
By resistance I mean that the rod reacts like a ball of mass of 10/3DaleSpam said:.2)The equations are the rule and they are the way to predict the behavior.
I am not sure what you mean by "resistance".
.
1) the rod has reacted in the same way 10/3 both with and without fulcrum.
2) I know I am asking too much, but as they found that a rod has I = 1/12, they might have studied that 1/12 corrsponds to 1/3 of the real mass in the collision. That would have made things easier and we might have got immediately ##v_1 = 7/13 v_0 = 11.85 , v_r = 20/ (13[*M]) = 3.385##