Movement of 2 particles Described by vectors

AI Thread Summary
Two particles A and B have velocity vectors v(A)=(2; 0) and v(B)=(0; 3), starting positions r(A)=(-3; 0) and r(B)=(0; -3) at time t=0. To analyze their movement, it's suggested to express their positions as functions of time, rA(t) and rB(t). This approach will help determine the reciprocal position vector rB-A(t), which represents the position of one particle relative to the other. The discussion emphasizes the need to clarify the direction of the velocity vectors for a better understanding of their trajectories. Ultimately, calculating the time and distance of maximal rapprochement between the two particles is the goal.
LinearMan
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
We have 2 particles A and B - velocity vectors: v(A)=(2; 0), v(B)=(0; 3).
In time t=0 these particles were in r(A)=(-3; 0), r(B)=(0. -3) (both are also vectors)
Determine a vector of the reciprocal position of A and B (means the position of one relative to the other). Compute time and length of maximal reprochement of A and B.



We work with vectors, so for better understanding i tried to put them into x-y coordinate system but a came across a problem with direction of v(A) and v(B). So I can't imagine the whole situation. I think next step will be to write r(A), r(B) as r(t), t=time
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
LinearMan said:
Determine a vector of the reciprocal position of A and B.
Does that mean the position of one relative to the other?
Please post your attempt at solution. (See forum rules.)
 
haruspex said:
Does that mean the position of one relative to the other?
Please post your attempt at solution. (See forum rules.)
yes, it does
 
LinearMan said:
I think next step will be to write r(A), r(B) as r(t), t=time[/b]
Yes, that would be a good move. For clarity, use rA(t), rB(t). Then you can also write down rB-A(t)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top