Movement of a wave packet of a free particle

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mathematical formulation of the wave function for a free particle and the calculation of its probability density. Participants explore the derivation of the squared absolute value of the wave function and how it relates to the expressions provided in their course materials.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents their derived expression for the squared absolute value of the wave function, noting a discrepancy with their course material.
  • Another participant suggests that taking the complex conjugate of the wave function is necessary to compute the squared absolute value.
  • A participant works through the calculation of the squared absolute value, confirming the manipulation of the complex terms and arriving at the expression involving ##\alpha^2 + \beta^2 t^2##.
  • Further clarification is provided on how to combine the exponentials to achieve the desired result for the exponent in the squared absolute value expression.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the derivation process, as they are working through the mathematical steps and clarifying their understanding of the calculations involved.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the properties of complex numbers and the manipulation of exponential functions, which may not be explicitly stated. The steps taken to derive the final expressions depend on specific mathematical techniques that are not fully resolved in the conversation.

Jillds
Messages
22
Reaction score
1
In my course there's a chapter with the mathematical explanation to find the real expression and localisation of a free particle with the superposited wave function. The same is used to explain the movemement of a wave packet (which is a free particle). I've worked out almost all the math behind every step, but the last.

## \psi (x,t) = e^{ik_{0}x-iw(k_{0})t} \Big( \frac{\pi}{\alpha+i\beta t} \Big)^{\frac{1}{2}} e^{-\big[\frac{(x-v_g t)^2}{4(\alpha +i\beta t)}\big]}##

Next we take the square of the absolute of the wave function. I know the first exponent would equal to 1 as a square, as it is phasefactor. And if I calculate the rest as a square I have.

## |\psi (x,t)|^2 = \frac{\pi}{\alpha+i\beta t} e^{-\big[\frac{(x-v_g t)^2}{2(\alpha +i\beta t)}\big]}##

My course, however, has a different result, and I haven't got a clue what my professor did to get that result:

## |\psi (x,t)|^2 = \Big( \frac{\pi^2}{\alpha^2+\beta^2 t^2} \Big)^{\frac{1}{2}} e^{-\alpha \big[\frac{(x-v_g t)^2}{2(\alpha^2 +\beta^2 t^2)}\big]}##

How does one get ##\alpha^2 +\beta^2 t^2## ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When you take the complex conjugate of ##\psi## (in order to find ##|\psi|^2 = \psi^*\psi##), you have to change i to -i everywhere.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jillds
Thank you,

so, if I understand you correctly I have to do

## \big( \frac{\pi}{\alpha + i\beta t} \cdot \frac{\pi}{alpha - i\beta t}\big)^{\frac{1}{2}} = \big( \frac{\pi^2}{\alpha^2 - i^2\beta^2 t^2} \big)^{\frac{1}{2}} = \big( \frac{\pi^2}{\alpha^2 + \beta^2 t^2} \big)^{\frac{1}{2}}##

But how does that help with the power of the exponent?
 
Ok, I worked it out for the exponent as follows

## e^{-[\frac{(x-v_g t)^2}{4(\alpha + i\beta t)}]} \cdot e^{-[\frac{(x-v_g t)^2}{4(\alpha - i\beta t)}]}##
By then adding the powers of the exponents and working out the numenators of the fractions I get the desired result.

Thanks!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K