Moving Charges to Infinity: Work Required and Comparison

  • Thread starter Thread starter aoc0708
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge Infinity
AI Thread Summary
To move the +2.7 µC charge to infinity, the work required is calculated as 0.61749 J. When considering the -6.1 µC charge, it is easier to move to infinity due to the interaction of attractive and repulsive forces from the other charges. The work needed for the -6.1 µC charge is -0.3999 J, indicating that it requires less energy to move compared to the +2.7 µC charge. The difference in work is attributed to the nature of the charges involved, where opposite charges attract and like charges repel. Understanding these interactions is crucial for accurate calculations in electrostatics.
aoc0708
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The figure below shows three charges at the corners of a rectangle of length x = 0.35 m and height y = 0.22 m.

http://www.webassign.net/walker/20-23alt.gif (rectangle image)

(a) How much work must be done to move the +2.7 µC charge to infinity?

(b) Suppose, instead, that we move the -6.1 µC charge to infinity. Is the work required in this case greater than, less than, or the same as when we moved the +2.7 µC charge to infinity?

Explain.

(c) Calculate the work needed to move the -6.1 µC charge to infinity?


Homework Equations



W= kq1q2/r

The Attempt at a Solution



I got the correct answer for (a) like this:

W= (9e9)(2.7e-6)(6.1e-6)/.35 + (9e9)(2.7e-6)(3.3e-6)/.4134, with .4134 as the distance between the -3.3 charge and the 2.7 charge via the pythagorean theorem.
.61749 J, was correct; and I guessed that it would take less work to move the -6.1 µC charge for (b). But I'm not entirely sure why this is the case-- is it simply because the distances between the charges are smaller? And for some reason, when I use the same method on (c) as I did on (a), I'm wrong:

(9e9)(6.1e-6)(2.7e-6)/.35 + (9e9)(6.1e-6)(3.3e-6)/.22 yields 1.247, which is not the correct answer. Why is this?

Thank you!


Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks to me like you need to take into account the sign of the charges. Remember opposite charges attract while same charges repel. The -6.1 uC charge is easier to move to infinity because it sees 1 positive charge attracting it, but also 1 negative charge repelling it.
 
Ah, I see what you mean. Thank you! The correct answer was -.3999 Joules.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top