MS Applied Statistics: Job Prospects & Program Competition

  • Thread starter Thread starter ralphhumacho
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Applied Statistics
AI Thread Summary
A career in statistics is promising, particularly in Chicago, where starting salaries for MS graduates range from $60,000 to $80,000. Many top-tier MS programs in applied statistics have low admission rates, but competition is less intense than for PhD programs, partly due to limited financial aid and a preference for doctoral studies among applicants. A solid GPA, strong GRE scores, and relevant experience, such as passing actuarial exams, can enhance admission prospects. There is a notable demand for statisticians in various sectors, including pharmaceuticals and finance. Overall, pursuing an MS in statistics appears to be a viable and lucrative option for those interested in the field.
ralphhumacho
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
Hello all -

I have a question I hope can be answered here. While I love Math, I know that there are very few jobs available with a BS/MS in pure Math. After taking a few Stats courses, I realized I can definitely make a career out of being a statistician. I already do the statistics for a Biochemistry professor at my university and would definitely be happy with working as a statistician. According to many Math/Stat professors at my university, salaries are high (starting salaries are around $70,000 here in Chicago with an MS), and jobs are plentiful.

In general, how competitive are MS programs in applied statistics? I was looking at Stanford, UCLA, Texas A&M, University of Chicago, Northwestern, University of Illinois/Wisconsin/Minnesota/Iowa, North Carolina etc... (pretty much top tier programs). Stanford, for example, mentions that 25% of MS applicants are admitted. Are these programs really not that competitive? Anyone have any experience? I definitely do not want to commit to a PhD. I just can't stay in school that long.

Also, I have a 3.7 GPA overall, 3.85 GPA in Mathematics. I'm planning on taking the GRE subject test next fall and am sure I can get 3 solid LORs.

Help?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I've been interested in similar programs, although not with quite as big names.

I've only applied to Western Michigan, and was accepted. They promise to teach regression, design of experiments, and SAS programming so it can't be all that bad. I've also passed the first actuarial exam and am working on the second so I hope to use these kinds of skills within the insurance industry (maybe finance, but that industry isn't fairing too well).

I've been looking around the ASA website and there seems to be some interest in statistical work (especially from pharmaceutical companies). I couldn't tell you much as I'm in the same boat as you, but I also get the impression not many people apply to these types of programs. Maybe people think the work is dull?
 
Last edited:
AsianSensationK said:
I've been interested in similar programs, although not with quite as big names.

I've only applied to Western Michigan, and was accepted. They promise to teach regression, design of experiments, and SAS programming so it can't be all that bad. I've also passed the first actuarial exam and am working on the second so I hope to use these kinds of skills within the insurance industry (maybe finance, but that industry isn't fairing too well).

I've been looking around the ASA website and there seems to be some interest in statistical work (especially from pharmaceutical companies). I couldn't tell you much as I'm in the same boat as you, but I also get the impression not many people apply to these types of programs. Maybe people think the work is dull?

Congrats on passing the actuarial exam. I did find out some more news from a Stats professor at my university which may be helpful. Most low-tier MS programs are fairly easy to get into. For higher-tier programs, you need around a 3.5+ GPA, >70% Math GRE Subject Score for higher-tier programs. The reasons that so few people apply, according to my professor, are:

1. Most MS programs offer no financial aid. Thus, you will be paying anywhere from $5,000 to $50,000 for the MS.

2. Most people interested in Stats usually opt to go the PhD route, which is free and generally results in higher pay.

The job market here in Chicago is, and has been for the last 50+ years, has been excellent (according to my prof - again), especially for MS degrees. There are quite a few big companies, hospitals, universities, and finance corporations here, all which are constantly looking for staff statisticians. Starting pay has been in the $60,000-$80,000 range for recent MS grads + benefits and 40-45 hours a week. I'm sure with additional credentials (such as an internship or passing some actuarial exams), you can probably get even more. I'm not sure about Michigan, however.

This is all directly from my professor, a Stats PhD who spent 20+ years in the industry before going into academia. Please let me know if you find some new info!
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Back
Top