Multiple Dimensions in Quantum Theories

lch7
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Will someone please explain to me how a theory, such as a quantum field theory, be expressed in more than three dimensions? Is this referring to the spatial dimensions we live in now, or what? And how does someone even begin to ponder these multiple dimensions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lch7 said:
And how does someone even begin to ponder these multiple dimensions?

By doing the math. You mention quantum field theory, have you not been through "regular" quantum mechanics? Hilbert space is infinite dimensional. Or how about phase space in stat. mech. Its got a lot of dimensions, a lot. These are not 'physical spaces', but they are spaces with many dimensions. If you haven't studied any of this, check out the wikipedia:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dimension_(mathematics_and_physics)
" the dimension of a space or object is informally defined as the minimum number of coordinates needed to specify any point within it."I don't know any quantum field theory. Some expert will chime in and kick some knowledge I'm sure. I don't think there is higher spatial dimensions in qft... I think that is a part of hypotheticals like string theory, etc.
 
Mathematically, it's very easy to formulate any sort of theory, quantum mechanical or otherwise, in any number of dimensions. Instead of dealing with points labeled by three coordinates, (x, y, z), just start talking about points labeled by, say, 5 coordinates, (x, y, z, v, w). Now you're doing physics in five spatial dimensions.

Visualizing it is another matter. Some advice I once heard: to visualize, say, 9-dimensional space, first visualize N-dimensional space and then let N go to 9.
 
Thank you all! Very interesting.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Back
Top