So I've seen quite a variety of notations that deviate from what we've learned in our "normal" math courses.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

In math classes we write a volume integral as:

[tex]\iiint_W \rho\, d V[/tex]

but somehow once we start doing E&M and QM, professors often just drop the extra integral signs:

[tex]\int_W \rho\, d V[/tex]

Is this justifiable? Or just a short-hand? I've seen this happen to both volume and surface integrals.

Then there's this stranger notation which is more rarely used:

[tex]\int \frac{1}{|\vec{r}-\vec{r'}|} \, d^3 r'[/tex]

Is there some particular reason why this is used over something simpler [itex]dV'[/itex]?

Maybe I'm just being too picky/OCD about notations, I dunno.

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Multiple integral notation (or abuse of?)

Loading...

Similar Threads for Multiple integral notation |
---|

I How to derive this log related integration formula? |

I An integration Solution |

B I Feel Weird Using Integral Tables |

B Methods of integration: direct and indirect substitution |

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**