Multiple linear regression + QQplots problem Includes pics

emelie_earl
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I want to do multiple linear regression, but one of the requirements is the residuals to be normally distributed, and I can check that with QQplots but then the QQ plot shows it is about 95% of data fit into the normal line, but 5% is way off!

can I still proceed ?*or do I have to find a way to transform the data ?*


5.jpg


5_residuals.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your plots show serious non-normality in the error structure, with (as you've noted) problems in the tails, and since least squares is incredibly non-robust you're correct to be concerned.
1) Have you noticed any strange behavior in your estimates (coefficients with signs opposite what you might expect)?
2) Have you tried a robust regression? The MASS package in R provides several good options.
 
statdad said:
Your plots show serious non-normality in the error structure, with (as you've noted) problems in the tails, and since least squares is incredibly non-robust you're correct to be concerned.
1) Have you noticed any strange behavior in your estimates (coefficients with signs opposite what you might expect)?
2) Have you tried a robust regression? The MASS package in R provides several good options.


Thank you!
I will try Robust regression.
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top