Multiplying a complicated frequency

  • Thread starter Thread starter samuelcupham
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Frequency
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the possibility of multiplying the frequency of a signal composed of multiple sine waves with varying frequencies. Participants explore theoretical and practical approaches to achieve this, including circuit designs and analog computing methods.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Charles introduces a signal S(x) as a sum of sine waves and inquires about mechanisms to multiply its frequency by a scalar λ.
  • Some participants clarify that a sum of different sine waves does not yield a single frequency signal, introducing the concept of beat generation.
  • There is a suggestion that the signal can be represented in the frequency domain, allowing for upsampling or downsampling techniques.
  • Charles expresses a desire for a hardware solution to avoid digitizing the signal, indicating an interest in analog computing methods.
  • Participants discuss the potential of using analog circuits to represent signals as voltages and to perform operations like summing sine functions.
  • One participant mentions the use of non-linear devices to generate harmonics of input signals, suggesting a method to isolate desired frequencies.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the nature of the signal or the best approach to multiply its frequency. There are competing views on the implications of summing sine waves and the feasibility of various circuit designs.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the terminology and concepts related to electrical engineering, indicating a potential gap in foundational knowledge that may affect the clarity of the discussion.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to individuals exploring analog computing, signal processing, or those looking for practical circuit solutions to manipulate frequency characteristics of signals.

  • #31
There is very little about summing, and frequency mixing that I don't understand. I know spectrally what the outputs look like relative to one another. Go ahead and continue, maybe we will get a description out of the OP as to what they want more specifically. I just wanted to point out that summing, is most certainly different than frequency mixing which generates new frequencies.
-
Maybe I misinterpreted you studiot and am sorry if that has happened. Summing signals together with a linear amplifier such as the one in post #12 never, ever generates new frequencies. I have interpretted you to have said that summing does in fact generate new frequencies in this thread studiot and if I have been wrong I am very sorry.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #32
There is nothing linear about a sinusoid of itself. The function f(x)=sin(x) is non linear.

There is nothing linear or non linear about the statement

sin(A) + sin(B)

any more than there is about the statement 5+7

Both are simply numbers.

A sinusoid function is a member of the class of infinitely differentiable continuous functions.

As such it may be added to other members of this class by the rules of linear algebra edit: when there is an integral (integer) relationship between A and B.
I have shown that the product of two sinusoids is equivalent to the sum of two sinusoids twice already in this thread.
This is standard stuff that may be found in most textbooks on the subject.
 
Last edited:
  • #33
Ummmmmm, not sure what to say. Seems like you are avoiding comment on what I have posted. I don't know what your comment about nothing linear about a sinusoid has to do with anything. A sinusoid is a sinusoid, nothing else nothing more. Did my mention of a linear amplifier prompt you to comment about sinusoids not being linear? A linear amplifier has nothing to do with a sinusoid. All it means is that incoming signals (such as but not limited to sine waves) are amplified by a factor of X. It does NOT mean that incoming signals (such as but not limited to sine waves) are multiplied by a factor of X as well as multiply with each other.
 
  • #34
now I'm getting confused - two old rules conflict

This shows that the sum of two sine waves is the product of a sine wave and a cosine wave..

Conversely the product of a cosine wave and a sine wave is equal to the sum of two sine waves

true enough at any instant from our high school trig identities. i looked them up.
yet i also know if you add two Fourier polynomials you get a different result than when you multiply them.

and one must multiply to modulate.

what gives?
if A = jw(a)t
and B = jw(b)t

does identity still hold?

i know it's just one of those mental wrong turns I've taken someplace.
Ahh the joys of aging...
 
  • #35
Seems like you are avoiding comment on what I have posted

?

The only avoidance I can see is that I have twice posted a standard formulae showing that the product of two sinusoids may also be represented as the sum of two (different) sinusoids and vice versa.

so if you have sin (a) +sin(b) you must have sin(c) times cos(d) where c and d are different from a and b
 
  • #36
Hi, Jim.

The answer to this conundrum is in post#20.

When we (amplitude) modulate the maths is given as in post20.
This results in three terms, not two, in the resulting expression.
Two of these terms are the relevant transformation between the product and sum of two sinusoids.
The third is to do with the relative amplitudes of the two sinusoids.

(Note my trig formula assumes this is unity in both directions)


This is saying that there is a difference between the three black boxes labelled modulator, multiplier and adder.

If you feed two sinusoids sin(ω1t) and sin(ω2t)

into an adder you will get an identical waveform to that feeding sin(ω3t) and sin(ω4t) into a multiplier.

But you will not get the same result if you feed

Asin(ω1t) and Bsin(ω2t) into the adder and

Asin(ω3t) and Bsin(ω4t) into a multiplier

does this help?
 
  • #37
I have said this before and I'll say it again. Addition is a linear operation and multiplication is a non-linear operation.

It's horses for courses but we still don't seem to know what course we are on. afaics, the OP talks in terms of an input signal that consists of a plurality of frequency components but does not specify exactly what he wants to do with it and what the output signal needs to be.

I am always uneasy with threads in which the OP takes such a back seat and everyone else talks at cross purposes and gets irate.

I think we should have a self-imposed rule that threads which are not kept alive by the OP should be allowed to die after one page.

Now - YOU put the phone down... no YOU put it down ... no YOU put it down first
 
  • #38
""Addition is a linear operation and multiplication is a non-linear operation.
""

with that i am comfortable.

next step for me is find the examples of both using Fourier polynomials. i have them somelace...



Thanks Studiot - that a condition is involved, your unity, is a relief.
""(Note my trig formula assumes this is unity in both directions)""

phone down.

old jim
 
  • #39
My phone is still up, I am just choosing not to speak at the moment. If you all can catch my drift. ;)
 
  • #40
\begin{array}{l}<br /> 3{x^2} + 4{y^2} = 16 \\ <br /> 2{x^2} - 3{y^2} = 5 \\ <br /> \end{array}

Here is a pair of simultaneous equations, both containing addition.

This is a non linear system, with more than one solution for x and y.

To obtain these we make make a transformation to a linear system

\begin{array}{l}<br /> X = {x^2} \\ <br /> Y = {y^2} \\ <br /> 3X + 4Y = 16 \\ <br /> 2X - 3Y = 5 \\ <br /> \end{array}

Which has one unique solution for X and Y.

Now tell me that addition is always linear.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
1K